Hello again...
I've connected my Linux (Mandrake 6.0) box to a huge hardware raid that
allows two computers to use the same disk at once, one computer has to be
read-only. We have a SUN computer connected to it that has it mounted rw,
and the Linux box read-only. I can read the UFS system
Hi, I have got a problem with md. This is, when I do:
mdadd /dev/md0 /dev/hdc /dev/hdd
tells me an error like:
/dev/hdc: No such device
/dev/hdd: No such device
But devices exist, because I can mount it.
I have RedHat 6.0 and kernel 2.2.5, also I am trying to update to 2.2.10
Thanks
Hi, I have got a problem with md. This is, when I do:
mdadd /dev/md0 /dev/hdc /dev/hdd
tells me an error like:
/dev/hdc: No such device
/dev/hdd: No such device
I hope someone corrects me if I'm wrong, but I believe you can only
add partitions into an md device, so you'll have to
I think, that is not the problem, because I had before Slackware and I have
md working with full devices and with partitions and it worked properly.
Sonia
At 08:06 AM 7/29/99 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I have got a problem with md. This is, when I do:
mdadd /dev/md0 /dev/hdc
Hi,
I think, that is not the problem, because I had before Slackware and I
have
md working with full devices and with partitions and it worked properly.
Sonia
At 08:06 AM 7/29/99 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I have got a problem with md. This is, when I do:
mdadd /dev/md0
Hi!
raidtools is the name for the new versions of the md-tools. RedHat 6.0
with kernel 2.2.5 has raid-driver-0.35 in it??? Please look it up in your
kernel messages (#dmesg | grep md). Or do you mean the md-tools to be 0.35.
I think Redhat-2.2.5 has raid-0.90 in the kernel and the raidtools 0.90
On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 03:33:14PM +0200, Sonia de Diego Atance wrote:
Hi again.
I want to mount a linear multiple device with md-0.35 (I do not know where
to find 0.36). I have RedHat 6.0 and kernel 2.2.5. I have found in RedHat a
package called raidtools with programs as raidadd. Do you
I don't buy this; the atime updates should be subject to caching,
and not get written to the disk more than the update daemon
(kflushd or whatever) forces.
Jan Edler
NEC Research Institute
On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 09:20:15AM -0500, Tim Walberg wrote:
For pure reads, there should be no
Apologies in advance for asking such basic questions.
Is it possible to use logical partitions on SCSI hard drives to make a
RAID-5 array? Can the partion type still be set to 0xfd if its a
logical rather than a primary partition? Or will I be better off to
construct the RAID array from
On 07/29/1999 11:18 -0400, Jan Edler wrote:
I don't buy this; the atime updates should be subject to caching,
and not get written to the disk more than the update daemon
(kflushd or whatever) forces.
True, if there are a small number of accesses, but I have seen
many
On 07/29/1999 10:24 -0700, Lance Robinson wrote:
AFAIK: RAID-5 accesses are always in stripes. All disks are read (or
written) no matter how small the original read/write request. Whereas, RAID0
can read just one disk for smaller requests. RAID5 does a lot more work for
Does anybody know if there is a driver out for the ARO-1130U2
TIA
Jim Woyach
Engineering Assistant
Monolith Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone 919-878-1900
Fax 919-878-8844
I'm having problems mounting a root-raid system. My raid setup is the
following:
md0: /dev/hda1 /dev/hdc1
md1: /dev/hda3 /dev/hdc5
md2: /dev/hda5 /dev/hdc6
(all raid1)
When booting with /dev/hda2 as the root and mounting /dev/md0 on
/mnt/newroot, everything comes up fine. The problem comes
Hi All,
I was wondering where i could find a patch for redhat 5.1 2.0.34 kernel.
i know about the patches on ftp.kernel.org. can i apply any of those to my
2.0.34 system ?
Thanks
Don Wisdom
Hi All,
I was wondering where i could find a patch for redhat 5.1 2.0.34 kernel.
i know about the patches on ftp.kernel.org. can i apply any of those to my
2.0.34 system ?
Thanks
Don Wisdom
15 matches
Mail list logo
