I did yesterday, same thing as with 2.2.12 - two hunks fail - but running.
Daniel
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Stephen Waters wrote:
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 09:22:21 -0500
From: Stephen Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel 2.2.13
anyone
Hi all !
After a night of hacking (and quite some surprises) I have a new
version of raidreconf out.
It's at the usual place (http://ostenfeld.dk/~jakob/Software-RAID.HOWTO/)
and this time it's a patch against the current raidtools package.
Added since last:
Growing of raid-0 now seems to
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 09:46:03AM +0200, Daniel Wirth wrote:
I did yesterday, same thing as with 2.2.12 - two hunks fail - but running.
The Hunks fail because Alan did not back out the changes made with the temporary
new raid code in the pre12 ...
Just ignore the fails ...
Flo
--
Florian
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999 13:12:23 +0400, Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
We don't have inodes in our FS, but we do have stat data, and that
is dynamically allocated (dynamic per FS, not per file yet, soon but
not yet each field will be optional and inheritable per file).
Does XFS
I'm sorry this is a bit off-topic, but large raid sets need big backups ;-)
My HP SureStore DAT24 stops after writing 12 GB of data to a DDS-3 tape. I
suspect there must be something wrong with the compression. To verify this I
need some additional information:
- What are the right dip switch
I have done everything that you stated in your README and I continue to be
stopped at the point of mdadd. It gives me the following error:
[root@mbjo raidtools-0.42]# /sbin/mdadd -a
Warning : no checksum field for /dev/md0
/dev/hdb1: No such device
/dev/hdc1: No such device
[root@mbjo
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Thomas Seidel wrote:
I'm sorry this is a bit off-topic, but large raid sets need big backups ;-)
My HP SureStore DAT24 stops after writing 12 GB of data to a DDS-3 tape. I
suspect there must be something wrong with the compression. To verify this I
need some additional
i've found that software compression (with our cheesy seagate backup
exec s/w anyway..) compresses better than hardware because it is able to
reorganize the data in a more compressible manner rather than the drive
just compressing whatever hits the buffer.
we average just under 18GB per tape w/
At 12:33 PM 10/21/1999 -0500, Stephen Waters wrote:
i've found that software compression (with our cheesy seagate backup
exec s/w anyway..) compresses better than hardware because it is able to
reorganize the data in a more compressible manner rather than the drive
just compressing whatever hits
For me, I'm just tarring up hosts to tape. When the tape develops an
error, and I use software compression (i.e. -zvvcf /dev/nst0), then I'll
lose the whole session. If I let the tape drive compress, it won't
compress as good (like you said), but at least I only lose a file or two.
-kf
Where can I find a description of /proc/mdstat?
For example, what means
md0 : active raid1 hdc2[1] 15004670 blocks [2/1] [_U]
in detail?
Thanks,
Joerg
Use afio or dump and you can compress/gzip/bzip2 each file individually.
Just my half-nybble.
--
Jeremy Stanley Trend CMHS
Network Engineer http://www.trendcmhs.org
The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily
represent those of Trend CMHS or Trend Foundation.
Is there any chance of getting the software raid and/or root raid howto
updated for whatever the current features of the MD device driver is?
I'm thinking of using raid1 on a bootable drive (/, /usr, /var, /home
partitions) and the documents mention some pitfalls, which may have been
fixed in
At 08:42 PM 10/21/99 +0200, you wrote:
Where can I find a description of /proc/mdstat?
For example, what means
md0 : active raid1 hdc2[1] 15004670 blocks [2/1] [_U]
this means /dev/md0 is running (active) is using software raid1, is using
/dev/hdc2 (raid disk 1 in you r /etc/raidtab) is
Kelly French [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
For me, I'm just tarring up hosts to tape. When the tape develops an
error, and I use software compression (i.e. -zvvcf /dev/nst0), then I'll
lose the whole session. If I let the tape drive compress, it won't
compress as good (like you said), but at
Title: To whoever maintains this list
Would it be possible to have something like [linux-raid] prepended to the subject for mail sent from this list? That would allow people to use their mail-reader's rules to file linux-raid email into a seperate folder if desired. I do this with the other
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Brian D. Haymore wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry this is a bit off-topic, but large raid sets need big backups ;-)
Hehe, i'll take the oportunity also to ask a couple things ;)
My HP SureStore DAT24 stops after writing 12 GB of data to a DDS-3 tape. I
suspect
From: Kenneth Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 17:01:09 -0500
Would it be possible to have something like [linux-raid] prepended
to the subject for mail sent from this list?
Being that I maintain the linux-kernel list as well, I think you
know what the answer is.
Hi,
I found the following anouncement from Alan Cox intresting.
http://lwn.net/daily/2.2.13ac1.html
The part I found most intresting was:
Features added that probably won't be going into 2.2. proper
[...]
o RAID 0.90
/N
--
Niklas Paulsson [EMAIL
yes - PLEASE
___
\ | Advanced Gary Post Systems Engineering Validation
/| | | MicroTexas Microprocessor Division
| |___| | Devices e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|/ \| Voice: 512.602.2634
Just sort it acording to sender instead of topic.
Im interested to know what mail reader can handle sorting by topic, but not
by sender?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 1999 11:20 AM
Subject: RE: To whoever maintains this list
Now that someone has started this thread :)
Are there any other "industrial strength" backup solutions like arkeia out
there?
I got my quote for arkeia today, and it was 7 grand. No way on my budget.
Amanda looks good, but not being able to append to tapes killed it for me.
Anything else in
Please disgregard this email.. I screwed up 3 times in a row.. not sure
how that happened but jsut after i sent the email i tried angain and it
worked for some reason before i was putting the an extra directory on
the partition, sorry to waste your time..
cheers
-marcos
(now to figure out root
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 04:09:14PM -0400, Admin Mailing Lists wrote:
Is there any chance of getting the software raid and/or root raid howto
updated for whatever the current features of the MD device driver is?
I'm thinking of using raid1 on a bootable drive (/, /usr, /var, /home
24 matches
Mail list logo
