Does anyone have any good sites for Linux/Alpha/RAID?
Thanks,
Marco
Dave Wreski wrote:
>
> > Just get the Alan Cox patches from your favorite kernel.org mirror, a
> > clean 2.2.13 kernel tree, and apply. No failures, just good clean
> > raiding.
>
> Is it in fact the case that the pre-patch-2.2.14-11 (released today) patch
> has the latest raid drivers in it? T
> Just get the Alan Cox patches from your favorite kernel.org mirror, a
> clean 2.2.13 kernel tree, and apply. No failures, just good clean
> raiding.
Is it in fact the case that the pre-patch-2.2.14-11 (released today) patch
has the latest raid drivers in it? That sure seems to be what you are
Bill Anderson wrote:
>
> Anders Qvist wrote:
> >
> > I would prefer to compile a 2.3.13+ kernel in order to get the most out
> > of my Matrox G400 (dual) graphics card. However, I have a system booting
> > off a raid 0 partition, so I need the new-style raid. There does not seem
> > to be raid014
Anders Qvist wrote:
>
> I would prefer to compile a 2.3.13+ kernel in order to get the most out
> of my Matrox G400 (dual) graphics card. However, I have a system booting
> off a raid 0 partition, so I need the new-style raid. There does not seem
> to be raid0145 patches for 2.3 kernels and patch
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Terry Ewing wrote:
> I also manually used cp to copy about 10 or 12 of the corrupted files from
> the original tree to the RAID filesystem. After this, the files that I
> copied did not differ from the originals. It seems that files become
> corrupted under a heavy load e
hi,
this is very reproduceable:
boot, raidstart, ctrl+alt+del, BOOM!
2.2.13 with Ingo's raid patch, booted from initrd, very small
kernel. the only special thing is the raid0 are hda & hdc
(no partition). i have other setups using partitions whi
I would prefer to compile a 2.3.13+ kernel in order to get the most out
of my Matrox G400 (dual) graphics card. However, I have a system booting
off a raid 0 partition, so I need the new-style raid. There does not seem
to be raid0145 patches for 2.3 kernels and patching the 19990824 version
onto 2
> I've done this on raid-1. I assume the procedure for raid-0 will be the
> same.
Sadly, it's not that simple. The difference being that each partition on a
RAID-1 contains a complete copy of the filesystem, so files can be read off the
physical device by lilo, whereas each partition on a RAID-0
