Hi,
We recently had an ups failure and some of our servers have crashed. When
reviewing the logs on the maschines I have spotted messages like:
kernel: md: serializing resync, md0 has overlapping physical units with md1!
..
kernel: md: serializing resync, md2 has overlapping physical units with m
I presently have an ide raid 5 system that uses master/slave disks
that I'm upgrading to controller/disk. Reading through the various
raid threads leads me to believe that changing the position of a disk
in the array can cause problems and/or data corruption. Is there a
"safe" way to do it since w
[ Sunday, January 16, 2000 ] Prof. Mad Crazy wrote:
> I downloaded the patch to use with my 2.2.13
> kernel but there are no instructions as to how I
> apply this patch. Or for that matter I don't
> know how to apply patches in linux.. What is the
> syntax for running this patch?
Assuming:
Hi all,
I have a motley set of disks that I'm hoping to use more effeciently via
raid. Any tips on this would be greatly appreciated.
Right now I have:
2 X 2 Gig SCSI
1 X 3 Gig SCSI
1 X 7 Gig SCSI
1 X 4.5 Gig UW SCSI 2
1 X 20 Gig IDE
I don't know the exact type of SCSI for the for 4 drive
Christien Bunting wrote:
>
> Hello.
> Can anyone tell me if there will be support for the ADAPTEC AAA-131U2
> controller ?
Nope, never. Adaptec has said that they have no plans to releast the
specifications for their "RAID" controllers. ALL RAID functions
performed by these controllers are don
There is a beta driver out now but Promise are not supporting it at all.
I have found an independant kernel patch that apparently works OK, but you
cannot boot off the array. You must use a stand-alone HD for the kernel and
then you can use it to mirror other drives. Apparently - I haven't tried
