At 23:50 05.02.00 -0500, Andy Smith wrote:
but fails to recreate the raid device md1? Any help is appreciated.
Would a mkraid --force command with a new correctly composed raidtab
solve my problem? How about the raidreconf patch?
No patches needed, you've got a different problem. (two,
Hi all,
I'm back and looking for more advice.
Ok, so I got my SCSI stuff running, seemingly smoothly, and decided to try
out RAID again. I started up md0 with 4 drives and 1 spare (actually the
spare was just another partition on one of the base 4 drives but what the
heck). I
Second thought: It would be nice to have something like RAID-5 but with the
Hamming code instead of only parity. If that could be done with decent
performance, that would be interesting:)There probably already is
some semi-unofficial number assigned to that level.
If you have
i believe you should be fine just letting it do its thing on its own.
cat /proc/mdstat
that should show you how far along it is, but it should be usable in the
meantime even.
-tcl.
On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, Brian Denheyer wrote:
OK. For the first time since I started with 1.1.54, Linux
On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 11:34:32PM +, Glenn McGrath wrote:
Second thought: It would be nice to have something like RAID-5 but with the
Hamming code instead of only parity. If that could be done with decent
performance, that would be interesting:)There probably already is
