raid5 on 2.2.14

2000-03-17 Thread Seth Vidal
Hi folks, got a small problem. I'm running redhat 6.1+ (2.2.14-5.0 kernels from rawhide and new raidtools 0.90-6) I've checked and the 2.2.14-5.0 are using the B1 patch from mingo's page. I think the raidtools they are using (mentioned above) are the correct version. Here is what happens: I bu

RFC: RAID superblock layout fix and reserved-bytes support

2000-03-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! BEWARE: Don't use the following patch in production, it might eat your RAID set for breakfest. Attached is a patch which does 4 things: - tries to solve cleanly the RAID superblock issues on non-x86 architectures (where sizeof(md_super_t) was bigger than 4096, usually 4104) by introducing RA

RE: Problems with IDE RAID5

2000-03-17 Thread Gregory Leblanc
> -Original Message- > From: root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 2:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Problems with IDE RAID5 > > > Having some problems setting up IDE RAID5 on Kernel 2.2.14 > > Kernel: 2.2.14 > > Patches: > ide_2_2_14_2124_patch

Re: upgrade from 2.2.12-20 to 2.2.14 breaks stuff

2000-03-17 Thread Luca Berra
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:40:07PM -0800, Gregory Leblanc wrote: > The patch applied cleanly, and I compiled the kernel with all of the proper > options (AFAICT). When I try to boot with the new kernel, I get: > > md.c: sizeof(m_super_t) = 4096 > Autodetecting RAID Arrays > Autorun... > ...au

Re: Root on RAID1

2000-03-17 Thread phil
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 08:24:54PM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote: > Hi all, > I need some help setting up boot on a RAID1 device. I used Method 2 of > Jakob OEstergaard's latest HowTo. I got it working, now my system mounts > /dev/md0 as root partition. But if I try to update LILO (to make it wo

No Subject

2000-03-17 Thread liuxg
Hello all£¬ I havemade some changes in linux raid , and re-compiled it . When I run mkraid /dev/md0 ,everything is ok! But when I run mount /dev/md0 /mnt ,something is wrong: It say "Got md request not good." Can some body tell me Why it caused the err

Re: Getting around disk numbering bullwinkle

2000-03-17 Thread David S. Miller
From: Gregory Leblanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 20:21:04 -0800 P.S. What's up with vger? Is it dying? Do they need a nice SS2 to replace it or something? It's already an SS10 :-) It is being replaced, sit tight. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems with IDE RAID5

2000-03-17 Thread root
Having some problems setting up IDE RAID5 on Kernel 2.2.14 Kernel: 2.2.14 Patches: ide_2_2_14_2124_patch.gz raid-2_2.14-B1 (Encountered Hunk problems, but I've heard this is normal) Tools: raidtools-19990824-0_90_tar.gz I have three Segate 6GB ATA66 Harddrives, two of which are hanging of

Ohh yuck! My RAID doesn't start...

2000-03-17 Thread Eric Y. Theriault
Hello-- I was wondering if perhaps someone could help me. In a rush, I turned off my machine a few seconds before it was done, and now my SYSLOG states: === Mar 9 18:47:07 ingress kernel: (read) sda1's sb offset: 4441856 [events: 0033] Mar 9 18:47:07 ingress kernel: (read) sdb1's sb o