> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Christian Robottom Reis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Mai 2000 21:31
> An: Martin Bene
> Cc: Ard van Breemen; Thomas King; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: AW: ICP vortex vs. mylex
>
>
> On Fri, 19 May 2000, Martin Bene wrote:
>
>
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Martin Bene wrote:
> Since you're into comapring benchmarks, let me contribute something from an
> IBM Netfinity server with IBM ServeRaid 3L Controller, Firmware + Kernel
> driver 3.60. Server is running with 1 Coppermine 650 Cpu, Kernel is 2.2.15
RAID5?
> Dir Size Bl
Since you're into comapring benchmarks, let me contribute something from an
IBM Netfinity server with IBM ServeRaid 3L Controller, Firmware + Kernel
driver 3.60. Server is running with 1 Coppermine 650 Cpu, Kernel is 2.2.15
Test run using tiotest 0.24
Disks: 3x IBM IBM-PSG DNES-309SAHRAJ2A0800 (
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Ard van Breemen wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 07:19:43PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> > If you want to know what slow means, I'll post some SW-Raid readbalanced
> > RAID1 benchmarks *grin* Mika rules!
> (*) Yes! I want to know what slow means!
> I get some v
Today power disappeared in a large area, including where my
company is. The UPS pulled the entire system for 5 minutes, then
I got news it was going to last a while, so I shut down all servers
(workstations were down anyways).
Everything seemed normal, power got back, and I started the
server
For people on [EMAIL PROTECTED], the context is the fact that RAID1
in the md driver uses b_rdev out of a failed I/O request to determine
the site of the failure, and if the underlying device remaps b_rdev -
as do RAID0 and LVM, it gets confused
On Friday May 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Neil Brown wrote:
> - md2 checks b_rdev to see which device was in error. It gets confused
> because sda12 is not part of md2.
>
> The fix probably involves making sure that b_dev really does refer to
> md0 (a quick look at the code suggests it actually refers to md2!) an
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 07:19:43PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> If you want to know what slow means, I'll post some SW-Raid readbalanced
> RAID1 benchmarks *grin* Mika rules!
(*) Yes! I want to know what slow means!
I get some very nice benchmarks, and .sig for free!
( ) No! I do no
On May 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Today one of my four SCSI disks in a RAID 0/1 setup broke. The kernel
> is 2.2.15 with Ingo's raid-2.2.15-A0. The error message says
>
> md: bug in file md.c, line 485
>
> Here are some details:
(deleted)
Yep. This occurred to me only yesterday as
Today one of my four SCSI disks in a RAID 0/1 setup broke. The kernel
is 2.2.15 with Ingo's raid-2.2.15-A0. The error message says
md: bug in file md.c, line 485
Here are some details:
# cat /etc/raidtab
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level0
nr-raid-disks 2
persistent-su
10 matches
Mail list logo