AW: AW: ICP vortex vs. mylex

2000-05-19 Thread Martin Bene
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Christian Robottom Reis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Mai 2000 21:31 > An: Martin Bene > Cc: Ard van Breemen; Thomas King; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: AW: ICP vortex vs. mylex > > > On Fri, 19 May 2000, Martin Bene wrote: > >

Re: AW: ICP vortex vs. mylex

2000-05-19 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Martin Bene wrote: > Since you're into comapring benchmarks, let me contribute something from an > IBM Netfinity server with IBM ServeRaid 3L Controller, Firmware + Kernel > driver 3.60. Server is running with 1 Coppermine 650 Cpu, Kernel is 2.2.15 RAID5? > Dir Size Bl

AW: ICP vortex vs. mylex

2000-05-19 Thread Martin Bene
Since you're into comapring benchmarks, let me contribute something from an IBM Netfinity server with IBM ServeRaid 3L Controller, Firmware + Kernel driver 3.60. Server is running with 1 Coppermine 650 Cpu, Kernel is 2.2.15 Test run using tiotest 0.24 Disks: 3x IBM IBM-PSG DNES-309SAHRAJ2A0800 (

Re: ICP vortex vs. mylex

2000-05-19 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Ard van Breemen wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 07:19:43PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > > If you want to know what slow means, I'll post some SW-Raid readbalanced > > RAID1 benchmarks *grin* Mika rules! > (*) Yes! I want to know what slow means! > I get some v

Power-outage story (OT/happynews)

2000-05-19 Thread Kent Nilsen
Today power disappeared in a large area, including where my company is. The UPS pulled the entire system for 5 minutes, then I got news it was going to last a while, so I shut down all servers (workstations were down anyways). Everything seemed normal, power got back, and I started the server

Re: Disk failure->Error message indicates bug

2000-05-19 Thread Neil Brown
For people on [EMAIL PROTECTED], the context is the fact that RAID1 in the md driver uses b_rdev out of a failed I/O request to determine the site of the failure, and if the underlying device remaps b_rdev - as do RAID0 and LVM, it gets confused On Friday May 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >

Re: Disk failure->Error message indicates bug

2000-05-19 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Neil Brown wrote: > - md2 checks b_rdev to see which device was in error. It gets confused > because sda12 is not part of md2. > > The fix probably involves making sure that b_dev really does refer to > md0 (a quick look at the code suggests it actually refers to md2!) an

Re: ICP vortex vs. mylex

2000-05-19 Thread Ard van Breemen
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 07:19:43PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > If you want to know what slow means, I'll post some SW-Raid readbalanced > RAID1 benchmarks *grin* Mika rules! (*) Yes! I want to know what slow means! I get some very nice benchmarks, and .sig for free! ( ) No! I do no

Re: Disk failure->Error message indicates bug

2000-05-19 Thread Neil Brown
On May 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Today one of my four SCSI disks in a RAID 0/1 setup broke. The kernel > is 2.2.15 with Ingo's raid-2.2.15-A0. The error message says > > md: bug in file md.c, line 485 > > Here are some details: (deleted) Yep. This occurred to me only yesterday as

Disk failure->Error message indicates bug

2000-05-19 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
Today one of my four SCSI disks in a RAID 0/1 setup broke. The kernel is 2.2.15 with Ingo's raid-2.2.15-A0. The error message says md: bug in file md.c, line 485 Here are some details: # cat /etc/raidtab raiddev /dev/md0 raid-level0 nr-raid-disks 2 persistent-su