Re: raid and 2.4 kernels

2000-07-30 Thread Neil Brown
On Thursday July 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 08:12:47PM -0700, Gregory Leblanc wrote: > > > Given the code at the moment, I am highly confident that linear, raid0 > > > and raid1 should be just as fast in 2.4 as in 2.2. > > > There are some issues with raid5 that I am lo

Re: Comparing 2.2.15 with 2.4.0-test5

2000-07-30 Thread Neil Brown
On Sunday July 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello > > I gave 2.4.0-test5 a try but am very disapointed with the results: > > ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- > -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- > M

Re: 2.2.14 patch

2000-07-30 Thread umshore4
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Deny Fahruddin wrote: > Hi, > I am newe with Linux, and currentlyI am using Caldera eServer2.3 with kernel > 2.2.14. I downloaded patches from > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.14-B1 and do the > patching (to enable me Raid 1). But the patching does not go

2.2.14 patch

2000-07-30 Thread Deny Fahruddin
Title: 2.2.14 patch Hi, I am newe with Linux, and currentlyI am using Caldera eServer2.3 with kernel 2.2.14. I downloaded patches from http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.14-B1 and do the patching (to enable me Raid 1). But the patching does not go clean. Always got error

Re: Comparing 2.2.15 with 2.4.0-test5

2000-07-30 Thread Holger Kiehl
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, bert hubert wrote: > Did you compile both systems with 'use dma by default'? Try using hdparm on > 2.4.0 to force it to use dma. > Yes, I checked dma is enabled. Holger

Re: Comparing 2.2.15 with 2.4.0-test5

2000-07-30 Thread Gary E. Miller
Yo Holger! On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Holger Kiehl wrote: > Also while playing mp3 and downloading files via serial modem from the > internet, 2.4.0-test5 just locked up with no messages in syslog. The machine > was just dead, it did not answer to any pings. I have had similar problems with all the 2.

Re: LILO for RAID1

2000-07-30 Thread su-27
>And whats when /dev/sda failed? In this case LILO not >presents on /dev/sdb, hmm? I installed patched lilo (0.21-15 from redhat distribution sources) and used separate lilo.conf for each disk as its described in Boot+Root+Raid+Lilo HOWTO from metalab.unc.edu. It works - now my debian starts from

Re: LILO for RAID1

2000-07-30 Thread Marcin Pilarczyk
And whats when /dev/sda failed? In this case LILO not presents on /dev/sdb, hmm? I installed patched lilo (from sources in redhat distribution) and used separate lilo.conf for each disk as its described in Boot+Root+Raid+Lilo HOWTO from metalab.unc.edu. It works - now my debian starts from each d

Re: Comparing 2.2.15 with 2.4.0-test5

2000-07-30 Thread bert hubert
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 10:28:50AM +0200, Holger Kiehl wrote: > Hello > > I gave 2.4.0-test5 a try but am very disapointed with the results: > > ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- > -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block

Comparing 2.2.15 with 2.4.0-test5

2000-07-30 Thread Holger Kiehl
Hello I gave 2.4.0-test5 a try but am very disapointed with the results: ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU