md.c: sizeof(mdp_super_t) = 4096 and other quirks

2000-08-14 Thread Christoph Kukulies
I took a stock 2.2.14 kernel, applied that raid patch (this time successfully), built and booted the kernel. Since I had a /etc/raidtab.foo i thought that raid wouldn't get autoconfigured but still I'm seeing these messages in dmesg output for which you may have an explanation: md driver 0

Re: where are patches located?

2000-08-11 Thread Christoph Kukulies
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 10:53:11AM +0200, Karl-Heinz Herrmann wrote: > > On 11-Aug-00 Christoph Kukulies wrote: > ># cat /proc/mdstat > > Personalities : [1 linear] [2 raid0] [3 raid1] [4 raid5] > > read_ahead not set > > md0 : inactive > > md1 : inactive &

Re: where are patches located?

2000-08-11 Thread Christoph Kukulies
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 05:07:42PM +0200, Karl-Heinz Herrmann wrote: > Hi, > > > On 10-Aug-00 Christoph Kukulies wrote: > >> If the patch is not clean (i.e. rejects) you probably had a kernel > >> patched > >> with the old style md-raid. The patch is prob

where are patches located?

2000-08-10 Thread Christoph Kukulies
I have found a raid patch on a machine in our net, which is: raid0145-2110-2.2.14.patch Having used patch under other OSs (BSD) I'm a bit puzzled why patch -p

need help with getting RAID0 up under RH 6.1

2000-08-10 Thread Christoph Kukulies
I'm running RH 6.1 and a 2.2.14 kernel from SCSI drives. Then I have 4x 60GB IDE disks which I want to format as a RAID0 array. I performed the following steps: 1. created a 0xfd ID partition 1 on every drive /dev/hda /dev/hdb /dev/hdc /dev/hdd: Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 7473 c