Raid/LVM ll_rw_blk problems Got xx request Was: (Re: LOTS OF BAD STUFF ...)

1999-11-07 Thread Florian Lohoff
It displays writing a couple of superblock copies and in the moment the drives (Up to 12) should begin to write - Nothing happens and instead i get an "Got md request". So it seems it happens in the moment the request queue/drive gets "unplugged" (Am i right with that ?) Flo --

Re: kernel 2.2.13

1999-10-21 Thread Florian Lohoff
. Flo -- Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5241-470566 ... The failure can be random; however, when it does occur, it is catastrophic and is repeatable ... Cisco Field Notice

Re: stripes of raid5s -> crash

1999-10-20 Thread Florian Lohoff
the stripe containing the both raid5s ... Very bad - This should work from the manpages but doesn (Reproducable with large and small stripe/raid sets) BTW: I am UP 2.2.12plain + raid patches ... BTW: The Hang does occur within rebuild and afterwards - Doesnt matter .. Flo -- Florian Lohoff

Re: Problems with persistant superblocks and drive removal

1999-10-18 Thread Florian Lohoff
both seperate raid5s. It seemd it mixed up devices between the raids and started one raid in "degraded mode" and forgot about the other completely ... When i tried to start the other it was complaining about disks "alread in use". Flo -- Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: stripes of raid5s -> crash

1999-10-16 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Sat, Oct 16, 1999 at 04:12:54PM -0700, Tom Livingston wrote: > Florian Lohoff: > > > Can you duplicate this using only one of the raid5 sets? I > > tried to cause > > > > A stripe of ONE raid5 doesnt make sense ... > > If you say so. > > What I mean

Re: stripes of raid5s -> crash

1999-10-16 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 04:11:31PM -0700, Tom Livingston wrote: > Florian Lohoff wrote: > > I did a bit further - Hung the machine - Couldnt log in (All Terms > > hang immediatly) - Tried to reboot and when it hung at > > "Unmounting file..." > > i got a term

Re: stripes of raid5s -> crash

1999-10-14 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 01:39:58PM -0700, Tom Livingston wrote: > Florian Lohoff wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 05:46:36PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > > Hi, > > > i am discovering reproduceable crashes with stripes of raid5s > > > > > >

Re: stripes of raid5s -> crash

1999-10-14 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 01:39:58PM -0700, Tom Livingston wrote: > Florian Lohoff wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 05:46:36PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > > Hi, > > > i am discovering reproduceable crashes with stripes of raid5s > > > > > >

Re: stripes of raid5s -> crash

1999-10-14 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 05:46:36PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > Hi, > i am discovering reproduceable crashes with stripes of raid5s > > Kernel 2.2.12 + raid0145-19990824-2.2.11.gz > raidtools 19990924 > > Message is "Got md request" and machine freezes har

stripes of raid5s -> crash

1999-10-14 Thread Florian Lohoff
0 device /dev/md1 raid-disk 1 -- Flo -- Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5241-470566 ... The failure can be random; however, when it does occur, it is catastrop

Re: QlogicPTI

1999-09-27 Thread Florian Lohoff
Following up to myself as the Bug takes no end ... On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 12:49:22AM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > The oops happens when > > booting > autodetecting a raid (and start to rebuild) > raidstop /dev/md0 > editing /etc/raidtab > mkraid /dev/md0 (with the no

Re: QlogicPTI

1999-09-27 Thread Florian Lohoff
20:17 3f 8c 4f sethi %hi(0xfe313c00), %o3 14 warnings issued. Results may not be reliable. Flo -- Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5241-470566 ... The failure can be random; however, when it does occur, it is catastrophic and is repeatable ... Cisco Field Notice

Re: RAID is now working...

1999-09-22 Thread Florian Lohoff
compatible file (Without knowing what i am doing). As my cards dont state "Performance Technologies" i think the 1.31 gets loaded currently (dmesg states Firmware 1.21 but per design the firmware gets loaded on initialization) So long ... Flo -- Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: RAID is now working...

1999-09-21 Thread Florian Lohoff
37:00 puke kernel: qpti2: IRQ 53 SCSI ID 7 (Firmware 1.21 95/05/18) [Fast Wide, using single ended interface] Sep 12 15:37:00 puke kernel: QPTI: Total of 3 PTI Qlogic/ISP hosts found, 3 actually in use. So - Which way to go for new Firmware ? Flo -- Florian Lohoff

Re: RAID is now working...

1999-09-19 Thread Florian Lohoff
blems with the QlogicPTI SBUS too. I have problems under high raid load where the SCSI bus seems to freeze (The drivers does ongoing resets of the single targets which does not stop until i switch the machine off) PPS: I am also interested in testing new firmware ... -- Fl

Re: LOTS OF BAD STUFF in raid0: raid0145-19990824-2.2.11 is unstable

1999-01-04 Thread Florian Lohoff
e (machines, harddrives, scsi controllers etc - Even on sparc ...) >From the manpage this is a feature which should work. Flo -- Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5241-470566 ... The failure can be random; however, when it does occur, it is catastrophic and is repeatable ... Cisco Field Notice