Diego Liziero wrote:
>
> I've tried to use lilo-21.5 in a root raid1 partition with a 2.2.16
> kernel with the latest raid patch (A0).
>
> I've installed lilo with the lilo.conf suggested by the linux-raid docs:
>
> boot = /dev/md0 # my root raid1 partition composed by /dev/hda1 & /dev/hdc1
> l
David Grimes wrote:
>
> I'm sorry but I do not know how to apply this patch.. when I do #patch
> raidreconf-0.0.2.patch
> It just sits there... can u tell me how ya'll made did it? Thank you in
> advance.
Did you type "patch < raidreconf-0.0.2.patch" ?
---^^^
btw. what is this p
Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 May 2000, Juri Haberland wrote:
>
> > Luca Berra wrote:
> > >
> > > get the latest lilo from metalab, it understands raid
> >
> > But it does not really work.
> > If I do a lilo with boot=/dev/md0 i
Richard Bollinger wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I've added a few hints to the readme file at:
> http://www.elliott-turbo.com/lilo/
>
> Hints: 1) Use boot=/dev/mdX and root=/dev/mdY as appropriate...
> lilo will figure out the underlying partitions for you
> 2) Add default= to make mi
Luca Berra wrote:
>
> get the latest lilo from metalab, it understands raid
But it does not really work.
If I do a lilo with boot=/dev/md0 in my lilo.conf it does write to both
disks. But booting from the second disk in the array is not possible.
I always get "error: 0x80" or similar right after
System Administration wrote:
>
> Juri Haberland writes:
> > System Administration wrote:
> > > Whoops! You're saying that SuSE's 2.2.14 *kernel* still needs
> > > patching (as opposed to just having raidtools-0.90 in the system)? Of
> > &g
System Administration wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Whoops! You're saying that SuSE's 2.2.14 *kernel* still needs
> patching (as opposed to just having raidtools-0.90 in the system)? Of
> course I enabled LVM and MD options along with linear, raid0, and
> raid1 personalities when I built the kernel use
System Administration wrote:
>
> A clarification and a correction: 1) I'm using raidtools-0.90
> (19990824) and 2) RAID0 was started with older mdtools and *not*
> mkraid.
>
> System Administration writes:
> > I'm almost certain this a FAQ (or soon will be) but I can't find the
> > answer. Su
