On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 02:30:06PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> Is there a reason the single disk raid patch isn't standard? Is there a
> preferred alternative? (For upgrading from a non-raid to a raid system.)
never mind--I just don't do this often enough to remember the op
Is there a reason the single disk raid patch isn't standard? Is there a
preferred alternative? (For upgrading from a non-raid to a raid system.)
Mike Stone
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 09:22:25AM -0700, Thomas Davis wrote:
> I don't know of any Unix FS with dynamic inode allocation.. Is there
> one?
Yet another advantage of XFS.
Mike Stone
On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 11:42:47PM -0600, Chris Price wrote:
> > Is anyone in the "linux-raid community" being paid to do research work
> > for redhat? If so, they should probably keep redhat informed. If not, I
> > think it's fair to expect redhat to do their own work.
>
> Are you daft, or
On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 08:43:49AM -0500, Erich J. Ritzmann wrote:
> I am inclined not to put the root filesystem on the raid drives; it
> seems more trouble than it's worth. Instead keep root to its minimal
With the latest raid patches, you can autostart the raid on the root
partition, so there
On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 09:43:12AM -0600, Chris Price wrote:
> Instead of pointing fingers at Redhat, I would ask if there is
> someone with teh Linux-raid community that actively corresponds with
> redhat to let them know of current status of linux-raid? Ingo etal. seem
> to be doing a supe
Quoting Carlos Carvalho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Javier Gonzalez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 16 December 1998 14:16:
> >The utility for restore or change disks is Raid ARRAY is raidhotadd, but
> >where is it?? It isn't in raidtools.
>
> Sure it is. It's a symlink to raidstart. Make install does
Quoting MOLNAR Ingo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> it's not possible to change the size of a RAID array after creation at
> this point. So hotadd makes no sense as it's only used to add/remove spare
> and failed disks from _redundant_ arrays that have a concept of
> failed/spare disks.
Can you create a s
