On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 01:43:49PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> raid0 will only get close to 'n' times a single disc when you have a
> number of separate threads accessing the device, otherwise there are
> fewer opportunities for multiple drives to be accessed at once.
> I believe that bonnie is sin
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 08:12:47PM -0700, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> > Given the code at the moment, I am highly confident that linear, raid0
> > and raid1 should be just as fast in 2.4 as in 2.2.
> > There are some issues with raid5 that I am looking into. I don't
> > know that they affect speed mu
I use the 2.4.0-test5-pre3 kernel together with Andre Hedricks ide patch
ide.2.4.0-t5-2.all.4c.patch.bz2 and reiserfs
The machine is a Athlon 650, equipped with 256MB of RAM.
6 IBM UDMA-66 drives of 46GB each, hanging on three Promise 20262 IDE
controllers form a raid5 software raid, reiserfs is
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 09:48:03AM -0400, Bryan Batchelder wrote:
> Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM ATA66 drives. What is the best ATA66 card to buy?
> Promise? I have a friend who set up a promise card and he said it kept
> crashing on him (once a day)
My HPT366 crash the machine hard, relieably and
