"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:03:03 +0100, mauelsha
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> THIS IS EXPECTED. RAID-5 isn't proof against multiple failures, and the
> >> only way you can get bitten by this
"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a FAQ: I've answered it several times, but in different places,
> THIS IS EXPECTED. RAID-5 isn't proof against multiple failures, and the
> only way you can get bitten by this failure mode is to have a system
> failure and a disk failure at the
