"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote: > > Hi, > > This is a FAQ: I've answered it several times, but in different places, <SNIP> > THIS IS EXPECTED. RAID-5 isn't proof against multiple failures, and the > only way you can get bitten by this failure mode is to have a system > failure and a disk failure at the same time. > To try to avoid this kind of problem some brands do have additional logging (to disk which is slow for sure or to NVRAM) in place, which enables them to at least recognize the fault to avoid the reconstruction of invalid data or even enables them to recover the data by using redundant copies of it in NVRAM + logging information what could be written to the disks and what not. Heinz
- soft RAID5 + journalled FS + power failure = problems ? Benno Senoner
- Re: soft RAID5 + journalled FS + power failure = p... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: soft RAID5 + journalled FS + power failure... Benno Senoner
- [FAQ-answer] Re: soft RAID5 + journalled F... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [FAQ-answer] Re: soft RAID5 + jour... Benno Senoner
- Re: [FAQ-answer] Re: soft RAID5 +... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [FAQ-answer] Re: soft RAID5 +... Bryce Willing
- Re: [FAQ-answer] Re: soft RAID5 +... Mark Ferrell
- Re: [FAQ-answer] Re: soft RAI... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [FAQ-answer] Re: soft RAID5 +... Benno Senoner
- Re: [FAQ-answer] Re: soft RAID5 + jour... mauelsha
- Re: [FAQ-answer] Re: soft RAID5 +... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [FAQ-answer] Re: soft RAI... mauelsha
- Re: [FAQ-answer] Re: soft RAID5 + jour... Stephen C. Tweedie