> From: Jakob Østergaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 1999 1:56 PM
> To: Linux RAID mailing list
> Subject: Re: [new release] raidreconf utility
>
>
> My only experience with LVM is from HPUX. I could create the
> equivalent of RAID-0
>
Jakob Østergaard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 02:16:57PM -0600, Mark Ferrell wrote:
> > You also have to remember that in most LVM implementations adding a device to the
> > LVM does not add it to the raid.
> [snip]
> > "Oh look .. the 90G raid5 array is getting pretty full .. I guess we shou
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 02:16:57PM -0600, Mark Ferrell wrote:
> You also have to remember that in most LVM implementations adding a device to the
> LVM does not add it to the raid.
[snip]
> "Oh look .. the 90G raid5 array is getting pretty full .. I guess we should add
> more drives to it .. oh ..
You also have to remember that in most LVM implementations adding a device to the
LVM does not add it to the raid.
For example, let's say we have a raid1 array with 2 devices on it, and we have
assigned the array to be part of an LVM. Now, let's say you add a 3rd drive. At
this point you have n
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 01:56:06PM +0100, Egon Eckert wrote:
> > There's a new version of the raidreconf utility out. I call it 0.0.2.
>
> Isn't this what supposed 'LVM' to be about? (BTW there seem to be 2
> different implementations of LVM on the web -- one included in 0.90 raid
> patch and o
> There's a new version of the raidreconf utility out. I call it 0.0.2.
Isn't this what supposed 'LVM' to be about? (BTW there seem to be 2
different implementations of LVM on the web -- one included in 0.90 raid
patch and one on http://linux.msede.com/lvm/)
Can someone clarify this?
A few mo
Hi all !
There's a new version of the raidreconf utility out. I call it 0.0.2.
You can download a patch against the current raidtools at
http://ostenfeld.dk/~jakob/Software-RAID.HOWTO/
New features:
*) Bugfix in RAID-0 growth. It now seems to work in all cases with
strange disk orderings,
