> > > http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
> > > let me know if you have any problems with it.
> > patch -p0 < raid-2.2.16-A0
> what source kernel ? from ftp.kernel.org ? or from /usr/src/linux of
> your distribution ?
>From kernel.org, of course. Sorry for bothering a
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> at:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
>
> let me know if you have any problems with it.
>
> Ingo
patch -p0 < raid-2.2.16-A0
patching file `linux/init/main.c'
Alexander Javoronkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> > at:
> > http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
> > let me know if you have any problems with it.
> patch -p0 < raid-2.2.16-A0
what source ker
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Douglas Egan wrote:
> Pardon my confusion.
>
> I want to move from 2.2.14 raid5 with IDE patches to support Promise
> Ultra66 to the 2.2.16 version.
>
> I have the raid patches, but I am confused about which ide patch to
> take.
>
> Should I use:
>
> ftp.kernel.org
> /pub
> > I hate to bother the list with this, but...I have been unable to get
> > Redhat 6.1/2.2.16+raid-2.2.16-A0 working with Root RAID1. I
> > have read just
You don't need initrd. See the cook book on the Linux Documentation
Project web site.
Boot+Root+Raid+lilo howto
just follow the directions
Douglas Egan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pardon my confusion.
>
> I want to move from 2.2.14 raid5 with IDE patches to support Promise
> Ultra66 to the 2.2.16 version.
>
> I have the raid patches, but I am confused about which ide patch to
> take.
>
> Should I use:
>
> ftp.kernel.org
> /pub
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Matthew DeFoor wrote:
> now!
> sdb6's event counter: 0006
> sda6's event counter: 0006
> request_module[md-personality-3]: Root fs not mounted
Seems to me you have raid1 compiled as a module. That's OK if you really
know initrd stuff, but personally I prefer to compi
[Matthew DeFoor]
> I hate to bother the list with this, but...I have been unable to get
> Redhat 6.1/2.2.16+raid-2.2.16-A0 working with Root RAID1.
>
> image=/boot/bzImage
> label=linux
> initrd=/boot/initrd-2.2.16.RAID.img
> read-only
> root=/dev/md0
>
> request_
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 12:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 2.2.16 RAID patch
>
> > the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-f
> the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> at:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
>
> let me know if you have any problems with it.
>
I hate to bother the list with this, but...I have been unable to get
Redhat 6.1/2.2.16+raid-2
Pardon my confusion.
I want to move from 2.2.14 raid5 with IDE patches to support Promise
Ultra66 to the 2.2.16 version.
I have the raid patches, but I am confused about which ide patch to
take.
Should I use:
ftp.kernel.org
/pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/ide-2.2.16/ide.2.2.16-pre7.2509.p
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 15:50:09 -0400, Ed Schernau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 04:36:39 -0400, Edward Schernau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >> Could this be changed to 2.2.16-raid for future versions or should I
>> >> better get in touch with kernel-packag
Marc Haber wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 04:36:39 -0400, Edward Schernau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> Could this be changed to 2.2.16-raid for future versions or should I
> >> better get in touch with kernel-package's maintainer?
> >
> >Or just get a real kernel from kernel.org.
>
> Debian
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 04:36:39 -0400, Edward Schernau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Could this be changed to 2.2.16-raid for future versions or should I
>> better get in touch with kernel-package's maintainer?
>
>Or just get a real kernel from kernel.org.
Debian's kernel package relies on "real" ke
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 09:02:42 +0200 (CEST), Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Marc Haber wrote:
>> A kernel patched this way doesn't build with Debian's kernel package.
>> Complains "The version number 2.2.16-RAID is not all lowercase. Stop."
>>
>> Could this be changed
Marc Haber wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 14:34:59 +0200 (CEST), Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> >at:
> >
> >http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
> >
> >let me know if you have any pr
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Marc Haber wrote:
> A kernel patched this way doesn't build with Debian's kernel package.
> Complains "The version number 2.2.16-RAID is not all lowercase. Stop."
>
> Could this be changed to 2.2.16-raid for future versions or should I
> better get in touch with kernel-pack
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 14:34:59 +0200 (CEST), Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
>at:
>
>http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
>
>let me know if you have any problems with it.
A kernel patched thi
> the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> at:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
>
> let me know if you have any problems with it.
>
Should CONFIG_AUTODETECT_RAID be defined in md.c? I can manually start
the raid and have it s
> the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> at:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
>
> let me know if you have any problems with it.
>
What version of raidtools should be used? Is raidtools-0.90-5 sufficient?
Thanks! - mattd
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > ouch, right - i've uploaded a new patch. (this problem was caused by a bug
> > in creating the patch)
>
> Much nicer, patched cleanly, thanks. Now time to see if it compiles
> and works happily. ;)
it should :-) the problem was in creating t
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> > Didn't appear to patch cleanly against a clean 2.2.16 tree, error
> > was in md.c and left a rather large .rej file..
>
> ouch, right - i've uploaded a new patch. (this problem was caused by a bug
>
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Didn't appear to patch cleanly against a clean 2.2.16 tree, error
> was in md.c and left a rather large .rej file..
ouch, right - i've uploaded a new patch. (this problem was caused by a bug
in creating the patch)
Ingo
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
> at:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
>
> let me know if you have any problems with it.
Didn't appear to patch cleanly against a cle
the latest 2.2 (production) RAID code against 2.2.16-final can be found
at:
http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0
let me know if you have any problems with it.
Ingo
25 matches
Mail list logo
