--Alexandre
> -Message d'origine-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Martin Bene
> Date: vendredi, 9. juin 2000 12:29
> À: Ion Badulescu
> Cc: Mike Black; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet: AW: AW: Patch for 2.2.16?
>
>
Hi Ion,
> I know, but I did it the other way around -- first the raid patch, then
> the 2.2.16 patch. This way, the failing patch is the one in 2.2.16, which
> is irrelevant.
>
> [read the message I was replying to, please]
Sorry, I missed this - you were perfectly right.
For a patch that aplie
]]On Behalf Of Ion Badulescu
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 9:17 AM
To: Martin Bene
Cc: Mike Black; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AW: Patch for 2.2.16?
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Martin Bene wrote:
> > The other failed patch, in md.c, is irrelevant for raid 0.90.
>
> Please be careful: If you
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Martin Bene wrote:
> > The other failed patch, in md.c, is irrelevant for raid 0.90.
>
> Please be careful: If you try to apply raid-2.2.15-A0 to a clean 2.2.16
> kernel, the patch to md.c will fail
I know, but I did it the other way around -- first the raid patch, then
the
Hi Ion,
> > Use linux-2.2.15
> > Apply 2.2.15-A0 patch (has two rejects which are harmless for other than
> > Sparc -- someone else will have to check for that one)
>
> They're actually harmless even for sparc -- they failed because
> they were already applied.
>
> The other failed patch, in md.c
