uhh- maybe cause you are compairing two completely different systems? try
using the same size and number of disks, same motherboard, same cpu, same
everything but the disks and controller, before you try to compair scsi to
ide...
allan
octave klaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
> I made the t
Hi,
I made the tests between ide and scsi soft raid and I do not understand
why scsi 2940u2w seems to be slower that ide on promise !?
thanks for your help
octave
PIII500/256/SCSI-2/RAID-1/2xIBM18Go7200
2.2.12
Dir Size BlkSz Thr# Read (CPU%) Write (CPU%) Seeks (CPU%)
- -- --
I couldn't read WINMAIL.DAT but I use RAID0 and EIDE drives (2.0.36
kernel):
[tim@asus]$ cat /etc/raidtab
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level 0
nr-raid-disks 2
nr-spare-disks 0
chunk-size 16
device /dev/hdg7
raid-disk
yes- we use raid0 on two ide disks for cacheing. i dont recommend that for
anything important though (/, /usr, /var, etc.) we have a big /squid that
we use for raid0, everthing else is raid1 on the same two disks.
doubling your chance of downtime due to hd failure seems irresponsible of
your own
I've been reading the mailing list for some time but haven't come across
anybody using IDE drives in a stripping configuration so here goes. I have
an 80486DX4 100Mhz Intel clone box and two identical Western Digital 850MB
drives. What I would like to do is put one of these drives on each IDE
