On Mon, 01 Nov 1999, Francisco Jose Montilla wrote:
[Very Good stuff snipped]
> - and raid level 0 sets for disk2 and disk4, as you don't care about
> redundancy w/ index files (you can easily recreate them). I don't know if
> using raid 0 in that machine will give more performance, (although you'
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Shoggoth wrote:
Hi,
> My RAID is like this :
>
> IDE0 >hda1 (170mb)
> |-->hdb1 (Seagate 210) |
> IDE1->hdc1 (Seagate 210) | -> md0
> |-->hdd1 (Conner 210) |
>
> on a 486DX
Hi all out there:
I'm new to this list , (just yesterday setup my first linear RAID) ,
and I would ask some questions :
My RAID is like this :
IDE0 >hda1 (170mb)
|-->hdb1 (Seagate 210) |
IDE1->hdc1 (Seagate 210) |
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Shoggoth wrote:
Hi,
> On Mon, 01 Nov 1999, Francisco Jose Montilla wrote:
> [Very Good stuff snipped]
> > - and raid level 0 sets for disk2 and disk4, as you don't care about
> > redundancy w/ index files (you can easily recreate them). I don't know if
> > using raid
