Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Darren Evans wrote:
>
> > can raidtools-19990824-0.90.tar.gz be used with your patch available
> > on http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0 for new
> > style RAID on a 2.2.16 kernel instead of the raid0145-19990824-2.2.11
> > patch
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Darren Evans wrote:
> can raidtools-19990824-0.90.tar.gz be used with your patch available
> on http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0 for new
> style RAID on a 2.2.16 kernel instead of the raid0145-19990824-2.2.11
> patch.
yep.
> I noticed the name had
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ingo Molnar
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [patch] RAID 0/1/4/5 release, raid-2.4.0-test1-ac15-B4
i'm also very interested in slowdowns relative to 2.2+latest_RAID, for all
RAID levels
you can find the latest 2.4 RAID code at:
http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.4.0-test1-ac15-B4
this is against the latest Alan Cox kernel (ac15), which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4.0test
which is against the stock 2.4.0-
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Gerrish, Robert wrote:
>The output of the dump command is:
...
> DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories]
> DUMP: SIGSEGV: ABORTING!
> DUMP: SIGSEGV: ABORTING!
> Segme
I am running Red Hat 6.1 on this particular computer which appears
to have raidtools v0.90, etc . . . all the latest working patches.
I had two mirrored partitions that were 8 & 6GB and we needed a 14GB
partition. Rather than repartitioning the disks (and having to
reinstalling the system), I
uhh- maybe cause you are compairing two completely different systems? try
using the same size and number of disks, same motherboard, same cpu, same
everything but the disks and controller, before you try to compair scsi to
ide...
allan
octave klaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
> I made the t
Hi,
I made the tests between ide and scsi soft raid and I do not understand
why scsi 2940u2w seems to be slower that ide on promise !?
thanks for your help
octave
PIII500/256/SCSI-2/RAID-1/2xIBM18Go7200
2.2.12
Dir Size BlkSz Thr# Read (CPU%) Write (CPU%) Seeks (CPU%)
- -- --
Well, it does work, just wanted to make sure I had things ordered
properly.
Now, I ran raidsetfaulty on /dev/md2 with device /dev/md0. How do I get
it to use md0 again without destroying data? This is what I see now:
md2 : active raid1 md1[1] md0[2] 26876288 blocks [2/1] [_U] recovery=63% fin
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 07:39:21PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I just need some help to make sure I'm doing this properly. All I ask is
> for quick help on getting this proper.
>
> I have 6 9 gig disks. I want to create a 0/1 level configuration. This
> is what I have in my raidtab:
.
I just need some help to make sure I'm doing this properly. All I ask is
for quick help on getting this proper.
I have 6 9 gig disks. I want to create a 0/1 level configuration. This
is what I have in my raidtab:
# Sample raid-0 configuration
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Andrew Doane wrote:
> > you can mirror RAID0 arrays no problem.
> I tried to use linear to combine two raid5 partitions. It died instantly
> with "got md request - not good".
yes - you cannot do it the other way around, yet. I'll fix RAID0 and
LINEAR to handle remaps corr
>
> On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Christopher A. Gantz wrote:
>
> > Also was wondering what was the status of providing RAID 1 + 0
> > functionality in software for Linux.
>
> it works just fine:
>
> [root@moon /root]# cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5]
> read_ah
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Christopher A. Gantz wrote:
> Also was wondering what was the status of providing RAID 1 + 0
> functionality in software for Linux.
it works just fine:
[root@moon /root]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5]
read_ahead 1024 sectors
md2
Is it possible. I have md0/md1 stripped, and md2 as raid 1 mirror, md0
mirrors to md1.
Anyway, the kernel seems to autostart md0 and md1 fine, but fails
to start md2.
Any suggestions.
Thanks
-jeremy
15 matches
Mail list logo
