Hi all,
I'm back and looking for more advice.
Ok, so I got my SCSI stuff running, seemingly smoothly, and decided to try
out RAID again. I started up md0 with 4 drives and 1 spare (actually the
spare was just another partition on one of the base 4 drives but what the
heck). I th
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 12:57:45AM +0900, Rainer Mager wrote:
> Feb 1 22:48:13 dual kernel: (scsi1:0:0:0) Performing Domain validation.
> Feb 1 22:48:13 dual kernel: (scsi1:0:0:0) Successfully completed Domain
> validation.
personally i removed the printk from the kernel source, i was getting th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 01-Feb-2000 Rainer Mager wrote:
> Multiple responses to responses in 1 message, I hope no one gets confused...
>
>
> First off, I did some testing with normal SCSI (no RAID) (yes, I do know
> this is a RAID mailing list, but everyone is being so helpful I
On 01-Feb-2000 Rainer Mager wrote:
> From: Peter Pregler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> I had similar problems (actually your messages could be a cut-and-paste of
>> my old logs) with my box at the beginning. The actual problems was that
>> the scsi-bus did not fullfill the specifications. Replaci
Woohoo! Somebody who knows how to reply to a thread!
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Mager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 7:58 AM
> To: Linux-RAID
> Subject: RE: Argh, more problems with SCSI and RAID
>
>
> Multiple res
Multiple responses to responses in 1 message, I hope no one gets confused...
First off, I did some testing with normal SCSI (no RAID) (yes, I do know
this is a RAID mailing list, but everyone is being so helpful I hope I'm
forgiven ;-). I wrote simultaneously to each of my 4 SCSI drives as fast
or you could just configure the transfer rate to be one notch lower than
your current level. had to do that with my 4 U2W drives in a hotswap box
w/ a tekram dc390u2b (symbios chipset).
-s
Peter Pregler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had similar problems (actually your messages could be a cut-and-paste
Hi,
I had similar problems (actually your messages could be a cut-and-paste of
my old logs) with my box at the beginning. The actual problems was that
the scsi-bus did not fullfill the specifications. Replacing some hardware
(hot-swap boxes) solved it. BTW, all worked well under DOS in the
test-e
Try turning off SYNC mode on ALL your drives in the SCSI BIOS. I had a
similar problem this last weekend with 2.2.14 and 5.1.21 AIC-7xxx and async
mode fixed it. I had been previously running SYNC mode with no problems,
but I added two new drives and couldn't get the mkraid to finish without
hit
gt;
To: Rainer Mager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Linux-RAID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Argh, more problems with SCSI and RAID
| Tell us how the 4 (5?) drives are scattered among the 2 controllers (2
| channels of one controller?), which id&#
[ Monday, January 31, 2000 ] Rainer Mager wrote:
> Feb 1 02:48:01 dual kernel: scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid
> 10920, scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Read (6) 00 06 df 60 00
> Feb 1 02:48:03 dual kernel: scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid
> 10921, scsi1, channel 0, id 1, l
11 matches
Mail list logo
