> -Original Message-
> From: Hugh Bragg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 12:36 AM
> To: Gregory Leblanc
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Benchmarks, raid1 (was raid0) performance
>
[snip]
> > > What version of raidtools shoul
Gregory Leblanc wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hugh Bragg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 5:04 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Benchmarks, raid1 (was raid0) performance
> >
> > Patch h
: Look at the Bonnies seek performance. It should rise.
: For single sequential reads, readbalancer doesn't help.
: Bonnie tests only single sequential reads.
:
: If you wan't to test with multiple io threads, try
: http://tiobench.sourceforge.net
Great, thanks, I'll give this a try!
On Wed Jun 21 2000 at 12:46:02 -0500, Diegmueller, Jason (I.T. Dept) wrote:
> : > Can/Should I apply the raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2 patch after
> : > applying mingo's raid-2.2.16-A0 patch?
> :
> : I don't see any reason not to apply it, although I haven't
> : tried it with 2.2.16.
>
> I have be
: None offhand, but can you post your test configuration/parameters?
: Things like test size, relavent portions of /etc/raidtab, things
: like that. I know this should be a whole big list, but I can think
: of all of them right now. FYI, I don't do IDE RAID (or IDE at all),
: but it's pretty aw
> -Original Message-
> From: Diegmueller, Jason (I.T. Dept) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 10:46 AM
> To: 'Gregory Leblanc'; 'Hugh Bragg'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Benchmarks, raid1 (was raid0) performa
: > Can/Should I apply the raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2 patch after
: > applying mingo's raid-2.2.16-A0 patch?
:
: I don't see any reason not to apply it, although I haven't
: tried it with 2.2.16.
I have been out of the linux-raid world for a bit, but a
two-drive RAID1 installation yesterday ha
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugh Bragg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 5:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Benchmarks, raid1 (was raid0) performance
>
> Patch http://www.icon.fi/~mak/raid1/raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2
> i
Patch http://www.icon.fi/~mak/raid1/raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2
improves read performance right? At what cost?
Can/Should I apply the raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2 patch after
applying mingo's raid-2.2.16-A0 patch?
What version of raidtools should I use against a stock 2.2.16
system with raid-2.2.16
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 1:26 PM
> To: Gregory Leblanc
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Benchmarks, raid1 (was raid0) performance
>
> Gregory Leblanc wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 3:56 PM
> To: Gregory Leblanc
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Benchmarks, raid1 (was raid0) performance
>
> Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> &
Gregory Leblanc wrote:
>
> I don't have anything that caliber to compare against, so I can't really
> say. Should I assume that you don't have Mika's RAID1 read balancing patch?
I have to admit I was ignorant of the patch (I had skimmed the archives,
but not well enough). Searched the archive f
Gregory Leblanc wrote:
>>--snip--<<
> > I conclude that on my system there is an ide saturation point (or
> > bottleneck) around 40MB/s
> Didn't the LAND5 people think that there was a bottleneck around 40MB/Sec at
> some point? Anybody know if they were talking about IDE drives? Seems
> quite
13 matches
Mail list logo
