Re: New user troubles: (1) booting (2) size?

1999-11-17 Thread James Manning
[ Wednesday, November 17, 1999 ] Kelina wrote: > Right, so now i'm confused, why couldn't i install rh6.1 over rh6.0 (kernel > 2.2.13 raid0 patch0.90). > It simply wouldn't detect my raidarray correctly... The only thing I can think of is that you were using initscripts to start your raid arrays

Re: New user troubles: (1) booting (2) size?

1999-11-17 Thread James Manning
[ Wednesday, November 17, 1999 ] Kelina wrote: > Okay, so lemme get this right, rh6.0 has new-style but not version 0.90? new-style raid *is* version 0.90 :) old == 0.42, 0.50 new == 0.90 James -- Miscellaneous Engineer --- IBM Netfinity Performance Development

RE: New user troubles: (1) booting (2) size?

1999-11-17 Thread Stephen Walton
Thanks to everyone that responded. I've learned a lot. Let me say what I know now and where I still have questions. (1) 'how to boot,' I'll experiment with some of everyone's ideas tomorrow. Again, though, my system has a SCSI disk which is booted from; there is one big RAID-1 filesystem on t

Re: New user troubles: (1) booting (2) size?

1999-11-17 Thread James Manning
[ Wednesday, November 17, 1999 ] Kelina wrote: > Ermm... do you mean a newer version than the old version that autostops > devices? Or the actual brand-newest spanking raid code which can also > be found as a patch in ftp.xx.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha > where xx denotes a country co

Re: New user troubles: (1) booting (2) size?

1999-11-17 Thread Michael Marion
Kelina wrote: > Correct me if i'm wrong, but doesn't the standard rh6.0 (and 6.1 kernel for > that matter) use old style raid? If you mean the version that uses the older tools (i.e. mdadd, mdrun, etc) then no. I have 6.0 on a box running a RAID-5 array and one of the last messages during a shu

Re: New user troubles: (1) booting (2) size?

1999-11-17 Thread James Manning
[ Wednesday, November 17, 1999 ] Kelina wrote: > Correct me if i'm wrong, but doesn't the standard rh6.0 (and 6.1 kernel for > that matter) use old style raid? Consider yourself corrected :) Considering Ingo's email addr (well, among others) is mingo@redhat and how thoroughly they got tested in

RE: New user troubles: (1) booting (2) size?

1999-11-17 Thread Kelina
> > As a comment: the docs should > > probably emphasize the importance of shutting down the RAID by hand if > > your system doesn't do it automatically, and RH 6.0 doesn't. > >Using new-style RAID, the kernel handles stopping the RAID at shutdown. You >should not be stopping the RAID yourself b

Re: New user troubles: (1) booting (2) size?

1999-11-17 Thread Robert Dahlem
Stephen, On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 16:05:19 -0800 (PST), Stephen Walton wrote: >Well I'm a new convert to software RAID on Linux. The system I'm >presently using is a P-150 with Adaptec 2940 SCSI controller, single SCSI >hard disk which is the boot drive, and a new pair of Western Digital >Caviar 20.

Re: New user troubles: (1) booting (2) size?

1999-11-17 Thread Luis Costabile
Hello Stephen. On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Stephen Walton wrote: > boot=/dev/hda > map=/boot/map > install=/boot/boot.b > prompt > timeout=50 > image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.5-22 > label=linux > root=/dev/sda7 > initrd=/boot/initrd-2.2.5-22.img > read-only > > to write the boot reco

RE: New user troubles: (1) booting (2) size?

1999-11-17 Thread Bruno Prior
> My problems: first of all, I'm open to suggestions on how to boot this > system now. I tried a suggest LILO setup: > > boot=/dev/hda > map=/boot/map > install=/boot/boot.b > prompt > timeout=50 > image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.5-22 > label=linux > root=/dev/sda7 > initrd=/boot/initr

RE: New user troubles: (1) booting (2) size?

1999-01-16 Thread Bruno Prior
> Correct me if i'm wrong, but doesn't the standard rh6.0 (and 6.1 kernel for > that matter) use old style raid? Like James says, I believe you are mistaken. As far as I know, RH 6.* uses new-style RAID. Cheers, Bruno Prior [EMAIL PROTECTED]