Christoph Kukulies writes:
...
> > Would there be a patch against an oldstyle md-patched kernel somewhere?
> > Since your distribution (Wasn't it RedHat?) is delivering it like that
>
> Yes, RH 6.1
>
> > maybe they should do that?
> >
> > But your best strategy is probably to grab a cl
On 11-Aug-00 Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>> So you have a kernel which is already patched with raid-code and you try
>> to
>
> patched with old style raid code?
Yes -- thats the problem.
SuSE is just the same -- They distribute kernels which include a lot of
patches and you almost can't apply a
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 10:53:11AM +0200, Karl-Heinz Herrmann wrote:
>
> On 11-Aug-00 Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> ># cat /proc/mdstat
> > Personalities : [1 linear] [2 raid0] [3 raid1] [4 raid5]
> > read_ahead not set
> > md0 : inactive
> > md1 : inactive
> > md2 : inactive
> > md3 : inactive
>
On 11-Aug-00 Christoph Kukulies wrote:
># cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [1 linear] [2 raid0] [3 raid1] [4 raid5]
> read_ahead not set
> md0 : inactive
> md1 : inactive
> md2 : inactive
> md3 : inactive
Yes -- thats old style md-raid.
So you have a kernel which is already patched with raid
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 05:07:42PM +0200, Karl-Heinz Herrmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 10-Aug-00 Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> >> If the patch is not clean (i.e. rejects) you probably had a kernel
> >> patched
> >> with the old style md-raid. The patch is probably against a clean kernel
> >> source.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>
> I have found a raid patch on a machine in our net, which is:
>
> raid0145-2110-2.2.14.patch
>
> Having used patch under other OSs (BSD) I'm a bit puzzled why
>
> patch -p /usr/src doesn't run smooth). patch stops at every file
> sayin
Hi,
> patch -p /usr/src doesn't run smooth). patch stops at every file
> saying it cannot find the file. Sorry if this may be a
> basic question but things are so different und Linux.
Hmmm... "-p" what? there is supposed to follow a number (at least patch on
DEC OSF4.0 wan
