On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, James Manning wrote:
> [ Wednesday, January 12, 2000 ] Scott Thomson wrote:
> > Am I missing something here?
> > The source has just been freshly untarred from linux-2.2.14.tgz
> > This is just the the first prompt. It goes on and on...
> >
> > patching file `linux/init/
Scott Thomson wrote:
>
> Am I missing something here?
> The source has just been freshly untarred from linux-2.2.14.tgz
> This is just the the first prompt. It goes on and on...
>
> patching file `linux/init/main.c'
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 19.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 488.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 928.
> Hunk
[ Wednesday, January 12, 2000 ] Scott Thomson wrote:
> Am I missing something here?
> The source has just been freshly untarred from linux-2.2.14.tgz
> This is just the the first prompt. It goes on and on...
>
> patching file `linux/init/main.c'
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 19.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 4
Scott Thomson wrote:
>
> Am I missing something here?
> The source has just been freshly untarred from linux-2.2.14.tgz
> This is just the the first prompt. It goes on and on...
>
> patching file `linux/init/main.c'
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 19.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 488.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 928.
> Hunk
Am I missing something here?
The source has just been freshly untarred from linux-2.2.14.tgz
This is just the the first prompt. It goes on and on...
patching file `linux/init/main.c'
Hunk #1 FAILED at 19.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 488.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 928.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 1426.
4 out of 4 hunks FAILE