Johan,
Thanks for sending the bulk information about this bug. I have never seen the buffer
bug
when running local loads, only when using nfs. The bug appears more often when running
with 64MB of RAM or less, but has been seen when using more memory.
Below is a sample of the errors seen while d
: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status:
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Stephen Costaras wrote:
>
> Now that I'm back on the list I wanted to bring this up. For
> the past while running linux 2.2.0pre6, & 2.2.0 release I've
> seen the following on one of my volumes:
>
>
sk failures are not a big problem.
> > disturbing lines on one of the consoles:
> > raid5: bug: stripe->bh_new[4], sector 8419312 exists
> How many lines showed up? And did this go on for a while?
Only four. I got a very nice reply from Gadi, basically explaining that this
is
re-RAID during months of heavy usage. However, yesterday I saw some
> disturbing lines on one of the consoles:
>
> raid5: bug: stripe->bh_new[4], sector 8419312 exists
> raid5: bh e2927d20, bh_new d2f1eaa0
> raid5: bug: stripe->bh_new[3], sector 8421384 exists
> raid5:
day I saw some
disturbing lines on one of the consoles:
raid5: bug: stripe->bh_new[4], sector 8419312 exists
raid5: bh e2927d20, bh_new d2f1eaa0
raid5: bug: stripe->bh_new[3], sector 8421384 exists
raid5: bh efbc6d40, bh_new e563cc60
What does this mean?
Should I be worries?
Anythi
