On Sat, 08 Apr 2000, octave klaba wrote:
> Hi,
> > hdparm -v /dev/hd[ac]
> >
> > See if using_dma is 0 or 1. If it's 0, either try a kernel where you can set
> > the ``Use DMA by default if available'' option to the IDE driver, or try setting
> > it manually with hdparm -d1 /dev/hd[ac]
>
> us
Hi,
> hdparm -v /dev/hd[ac]
>
> See if using_dma is 0 or 1. If it's 0, either try a kernel where you can set
> the ``Use DMA by default if available'' option to the IDE driver, or try setting
> it manually with hdparm -d1 /dev/hd[ac]
using 2.2.14 I chose "Use DMA by default when available" and
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, octave klaba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > >From the CPU load on the raid-1 soft IDE test, I think seems likely that you
> > didn't have DMA enabled. Could that be possible ?
>
> how can I verify it ?
hdparm -v /dev/hd[ac]
See if using_dma is 0 or 1. If it's 0, either try a kerne
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Mike Bilow wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Jakob Østergaard wrote:
>
...
> > >From the CPU load on the raid-1 soft IDE test, I think seems likely that you
> > didn't have DMA enabled. Could that be possible ?
> >
> > It doesn't make sense to have 97% CPU load when reading wi
Hi,
> >From the CPU load on the raid-1 soft IDE test, I think seems likely that you
> didn't have DMA enabled. Could that be possible ?
how can I verify it ?
Amicalement,
Octave
> no swap allowed <
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, octave klaba wrote:
> > Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
> > > > 1° 2000 9212 96.4 20354 13.9 4411 3.6 3822 35.4 22180 8.0 85.6 0.7
> > > > 2° 2000 1727 22.4 2095 5.5 1381 34.9 3070 98.6 4320 97.8 74.8 7.3
> > > > 3° 2
> Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
> > > 1° 2000 9212 96.4 20354 13.9 4411 3.6 3822 35.4 22180 8.0 85.6 0.7
> > > 2° 2000 1727 22.4 2095 5.5 1381 34.9 3070 98.6 4320 97.8 74.8 7.3
> > > 3° 2000 7236 91.6 18321 15.5 8003 13.7 8347 96.7 18
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 08:22:22AM -0500, Mike Bilow wrote:
> > >From the CPU load on the raid-1 soft IDE test, I think seems likely that you
> > didn't have DMA enabled. Could that be possible ?
> >
> > It doesn't make sense to have 97% CPU load when reading with 4 MB/s unless
> > it's done wi
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Jakob Østergaard wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, octave klaba wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > a test between single ide <-> raid-1 soft ide <-> raid-1 soft scsi-2
> >
> > 1° PIII600/128RAM/1XIDE20.5
> > 2° PIII600/128RAM/2XIDE20.5 raid-1 soft
> > 3° PIII500/256/29
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, octave klaba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a test between single ide <-> raid-1 soft ide <-> raid-1 soft scsi-2
>
> 1° PIII600/128RAM/1XIDE20.5
> 2° PIII600/128RAM/2XIDE20.5 raid-1 soft
> 3° PIII500/256/2940U2W/SCSI-2/RAID-1/IBM18Go7200
>
> ---Sequential
Hi,
a test between single ide <-> raid-1 soft ide <-> raid-1 soft scsi-2
1° PIII600/128RAM/1XIDE20.5
2° PIII600/128RAM/2XIDE20.5 raid-1 soft
3° PIII500/256/2940U2W/SCSI-2/RAID-1/IBM18Go7200
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Pe
11 matches
Mail list logo