On 19-Aug-10 3:59 AM, Ira Weiny wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:58:44 -0700
Yevgeny Kliteynikklit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18-Aug-10 7:06 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:38:14 -0700
Yevgeny Kliteynikklit...@dev.mellanox.co.il wrote:
Don't bother reporting events to plug-ins
Bob Pearson wrote:
I was curious to see if I could force a ConnectX device to slow down from a
remote application.
But since the MADs have been crippled for IBOE there is no way to configure
it.
QP1 MADs are working for ConnectX, e.g the IB CM is fully functional for IBoE,
and I don't
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:54:17AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Bob Pearson wrote:
I was curious to see if I could force a ConnectX device to slow down from a
remote application.
But since the MADs have been crippled for IBOE there is no way to configure
it.
QP1 MADs are working for
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:48 AM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:55 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Implements SRP_CRED_REQ and SRP_AER_REQ, which are information units defined
in the SRP (draft) standard. Adds declarations for the SRP_CRED_REQ,
SRP_CRED_RSP,
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 08:04 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:44 AM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:54 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
@@ -989,19 +989,21 @@ static void srp_send_completion(struct ib_cq *cq,
void *target_ptr)
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 12:10 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:48 AM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:55 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Implements SRP_CRED_REQ and SRP_AER_REQ, which are information units
defined
in the SRP (draft)
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 12:10 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:48 AM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
[ ... ]
If I do not receive any further feedback,
I will modify srp_handle_req()
During the .35 merge window I attempted to merge the ummunotify driver and
was told by Linus that he didn't like the approach. At that point several
members of the RDMA community were hashing out a way to do the same thing
that would get Linus' blessing. I haven't seen anything about it since
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:44 PM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 08:04 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:44 AM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:54 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
@@ -989,19 +989,21 @@
During the .35 merge window I attempted to merge the ummunotify driver and
was told by Linus that he didn't like the approach. At that point several
members of the RDMA community were hashing out a way to do the same thing
that would get Linus' blessing. I haven't seen anything about it
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 18:53 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:44 PM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
Put the assignment on the same line as the declaration and I'll deal
with the name.
Putting the rsv assignment on the same line as its declaration would
make
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:25 PM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 18:53 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:44 PM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
Put the assignment on the same line as the declaration and I'll deal
with the name.
Putting the rsv assignment on the same line as its declaration would
make that line exceed 80 columns and hence would trigger a checkpatch
complaint, so it's better to keep it as it is now.
I didn't check it with checkpatch, but vi tells me it is 78 characters.
In any case I think the
Hi gang,
We're chasing a bug that we can hit when we pull IB cables with
CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGE_ALLOC enabled. It appears as though the to_ipoib_neigh() in
ipoib_neigh_free() under ipoib_mcast_free() is referencing a freed neighbour
struct.
The invariant here, as far as I can tell, is that
14 matches
Mail list logo
