Hi Or,
On 12:07 Thu 07 Jul , Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I just noted that opensm logs can go anywhere in size when one of my
> nodes had no space left on device after the opensm log level was raised...
>
> I see that the rpm provided with RHEL6 is setting an
> /etc/logrotate.d/opensm
>
Hi Ira,
On 14:39 Wed 06 Jul , Ira Weiny wrote:
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny
> ---
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.
Hi Ira,
On 15:11 Wed 06 Jul , Ira Weiny wrote:
> This should at least be compiled in by default.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny
> ---
Sounds like a good idea.
If we change the defaults, why should we keep this option for configure
script? Is it really needed?
What about performance manager
Yes, the kernel crashed after watchdog detected a lockup. This
happened while running udaddy -p 0x2 with RoCE. The crash isn't 100%
reproducible but I have a pair of nodes where that used to crash with
probability of 50%.
The fix you suggest seems to detect the mismatch between port space
and link
Hi Hal,
On 13:24 Tue 05 Jul , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
> ---
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordom
Hey Arlin,
I have a dumb question: Is dapltest designed to support multiple dapltest client processes running on multiple physical
systems to connect to a single dapltest server process/system?
I'm running tests where we have 4 client nodes running dapltest transaction clients connecting to t
Steve,
Thanks for the reply. Sounds good, I completely agree
with your suggestions.
Many thanks,
Bernard.
Steve Wise wrote on 07/07/2011 04:04:05 PM:
> On 06/30/2011 11:23 AM, Bernard Metzler wrote:
> > Good point. I moved the three attributes to debugfs which
> > looks much more appropriate.
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 03:49:27 -0700
Alex Netes wrote:
> Hi Ira,
>
> On 15:11 Wed 06 Jul , Ira Weiny wrote:
> > This should at least be compiled in by default.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny
> > ---
>
> Sounds like a good idea.
> If we change the defaults, why should we keep this opti
>-Original Message-
>From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org
>[mailto:linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Steve Wise
>Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 8:23 AM
>To: Davis, Arlin R
>Cc: linux-rdma
>Subject: dapltest question
>
>Hey Arlin,
>
>I have a dumb question: Is dapltest designed
Ira,
On 7/8/2011 12:06 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> However, when we first put the PerfMgr in OpenSM there was some concern for
> developers who may be using OpenSM in an embedded environment.
Do you recall the specific concerns ? I forget and would rather not dig
them out unless really necessary...
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> Change the copyright info from Sun Microsystems to Oracle since Oracle now
> owns them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock
>
> ---
> drivers/char/nvram.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/c
On 07/08/2011 11:14 AM, Smith, Stan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Steve Wise
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 8:23 AM
To: Davis, Arlin R
Cc: linux-rdma
Subject: dapltest question
Hey Arlin,
I have a du
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 09:23:50 -0700
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Ira,
>
> On 7/8/2011 12:06 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > However, when we first put the PerfMgr in OpenSM there was some concern for
> > developers who may be using OpenSM in an embedded environment.
>
> Do you recall the specific concerns ?
On 07/08/2011 09:33 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
Change the copyright info from Sun Microsystems to Oracle since Oracle now owns
them.
Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock
---
drivers/char/nvram.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:50:21 -0700
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
Thanks applied,
Ira
> ---
> include/infiniband/mad.h | 48
> +-
> src/dump.c |5
> src/fields.c | 45 +
Hey Hal,
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:50:21 -0700
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
> ---
> include/infiniband/mad.h | 48
> +-
> src/dump.c |5
> src/fields.c | 45 +
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:50:03 -0700
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Add support for new LinkSpeedExt* components in SM PortInfo attribute
>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
Thanks, _this_ one is applied...
Ira
> ---
> include/infiniband/mad.h |9 +
> src/dump.c | 75 +++
Ooops...
I mean to say 1/3 was applied... See other email for comments.
Sorry,
Ira
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:34:32 -0700
Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:50:21 -0700
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
>
> Thanks applied,
> Ira
>
> > ---
> > include/infi
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:50:12 -0700
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> Need larger buffer for mad_dump_portinfo due to additional extended
> speed fields
>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
Thanks, applied,
Ira
> ---
> diff --git a/src/saquery.c b/src/saquery.c
> index 7933fec..53ab1b6 100644
> --- a/src/
Hi Ira,
On 7/8/2011 4:35 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Hey Hal,
>
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:50:21 -0700
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
>> ---
>> include/infiniband/mad.h | 48
>> +-
>> src/dump.c |5
>>
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 14:23:48 -0700
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Hi Ira,
>
> On 7/8/2011 4:35 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > Hey Hal,
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:50:21 -0700
> > Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
> >> ---
> >> include/infiniband/mad.h | 48
> >> ++
On 7/5/2011 3:08 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
>
> While this is sub-optimal it is the easiest way to get saquery support to the
> other diags.
Just some nits below...
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny
> ---
> include/ibdiag_common.h | 45 +++
> src/ibdiag_common.c | 172 +++
On 7/5/2011 3:08 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
Can you explain what issue this solves or is it just to move to the SA
way to do this ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny
> ---
> include/ibdiag_common.h |3 ++
> src/ibdiag_common.c | 55
> +++
> src/iblin
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 05:42:38PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Should the request just be a GET rather than GET_TABLE and avoid this
> check ? I don't think multiple nodes can register with same Node GUID,
> can they ? Also, I think it makes eliminates this check and the missing
> 0 check.
Mul
On 7/8/2011 5:50 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 05:42:38PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
>> Should the request just be a GET rather than GET_TABLE and avoid this
>> check ? I don't think multiple nodes can register with same Node GUID,
>> can they ? Also, I think it makes el
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 14:59:01 -0700
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On 7/8/2011 5:50 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 05:42:38PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> >> Should the request just be a GET rather than GET_TABLE and avoid this
> >> check ? I don't think multiple nodes can r
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 03:29:53PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 14:59:01 -0700
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> > On 7/8/2011 5:50 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 05:42:38PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > >
> > >> Should the request just be a GET rather than
27 matches
Mail list logo
