Announcing the Release of MVAPICH2 1.7 and OSU Micro-Benchmarks (OMB) 3.4

2011-10-14 Thread Dhabaleswar Panda
The MVAPICH team is pleased to announce the release of MVAPICH2-1.7 and OSU Micro-Benchmarks (OMB) 3.4. The complete set of Features, Enhancements, and Bug Fixes for MVAPICH2 1.7 (since MVAPICH2-1.6 release) are listed here. - Based on MPICH2-1.4.1p1 - Integrated Hybrid (UD-RC/XRC) design

RE: rdma: 3.1.0-rc9 breaks UD

2011-10-14 Thread Hefty, Sean
> I wonder how important wire compatibilty of the ibv_xx_pingpong > examples is... should I worry about this? I know that for some of the larger clusters, they may not be able to upgrade the software on all systems during a scheduled downtime. This is about the only reason I can think of why yo

Re: Building 3.1-rc9 in kernel infiniband support with OFED libraries

2011-10-14 Thread Doug Ledford
- Original Message - > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Wendy Cheng > wrote: > > The OFED package itself does include XRC support. The issue here > > (my > > guess) is that its build script needs to understand the running > > system's kernel version to decide what should be pulled (from th

Re: Building 3.1-rc9 in kernel infiniband support with OFED libraries

2011-10-14 Thread Doug Ledford
- Original Message - > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Jason Gunthorpe > wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:02:41AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > >> Has XRC support not been merged? How can I build the OFED > >> libraries > >> against Linux 3.1? I'd really like to get rid of the OF

Re: Building 3.1-rc9 in kernel infiniband support with OFED libraries

2011-10-14 Thread Doug Ledford
- Original Message - > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Christoph Lameter > wrote: > >> Clean reviewed patches for this are where? > > > > They are in OFED-1.5.3.1 so they were already released. > > OFED is neither clean nor reviewed. Really. The stuff in OFED > always > needs a bunch

Re: [PATCH] RDMA/cxgb4: Unblock reads on comp_channel

2011-10-14 Thread Roland Dreier
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Steve Wise wrote: > I'm not sure other drivers have this issue.  For example, when a mlx or > mthca QP moves out of RTS, does the HW flush the pending recv WRs?  For > Chelsio devices, the provider driver/library must handle this. Yeah, mthca will generate the flu

RE: [PATCH] rdma/core: Really export ib_open_qp() to user space

2011-10-14 Thread Hefty, Sean
> I pulled the xrc patches in your for-next branch and ran some simple > tests against it. Between the last time I tested XRC and now, I'm now > seeing mvapich2 hang during MPI finalize, which I'm debugging. Just an update: the issues that I was seeing were caused by missing patches in my librar

Re: Query regarding which tree to use to create upstream patches

2011-10-14 Thread Roland Dreier
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Vipul Pandya wrote: > 1) We make our patch series against 'linux-next' tree (which has > ‘drivers/net’ directory changes and latest changes from ‘infiniband’ tree) > and submit them to you and you can accordingly decide when to merge them in > your tree. This seem

Re: rdma: 3.1.0-rc9 breaks UD

2011-10-14 Thread Roland Dreier
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Hefty, Sean wrote: > Actually, mine did too.  I wonder if this OFED patch to libibverbs is causing > the issue: > > http://git.openfabrics.org/git?p=ofed_1_5/libibverbs.git;a=blob;f=fixes/rocee_examples.patch;h=eda5a401a3424a104e8100848b5b6bf4e5b63bee;hb=HEAD Hmm

RE: rdma: 3.1.0-rc9 breaks UD

2011-10-14 Thread Hefty, Sean
> Our 3.1-rc9 included Rolands for-next branch. Actually, mine did too. I wonder if this OFED patch to libibverbs is causing the issue: http://git.openfabrics.org/git?p=ofed_1_5/libibverbs.git;a=blob;f=fixes/rocee_examples.patch;h=eda5a401a3424a104e8100848b5b6bf4e5b63bee;hb=HEAD -- To unsubscri

Re: rdma: 3.1.0-rc9 breaks UD

2011-10-14 Thread Roland Dreier
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Our 3.1-rc9 included Rolands for-next branch. There are a few RDMA-related changes there :) A bisect from 3.1-rc9 to my for-next branch shouldn't take too long if you get chance, otherwise I'll try to take a look soon. This is with mlx

RE: rdma: 3.1.0-rc9 breaks UD

2011-10-14 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Hefty, Sean wrote: > > Running ibv_ud_pingpong and ibc_uc_pingpong between two hosts. One with > > OFED 1.5.3.1 (Ubuntu LTS 10.04) and another on linux 3.1.0-rc9 (Same > > ubuntu version uderlying) with the upstream libraries. > > FWIW, I was able to run 3.1-rc9 in loopback an

RE: rdma: 3.1.0-rc9 breaks UD

2011-10-14 Thread Hefty, Sean
> Running ibv_ud_pingpong and ibc_uc_pingpong between two hosts. One with > OFED 1.5.3.1 (Ubuntu LTS 10.04) and another on linux 3.1.0-rc9 (Same > ubuntu version uderlying) with the upstream libraries. FWIW, I was able to run 3.1-rc9 in loopback and between 3.0 and 3.1-rc9 systems. I don't have

rdma: 3.1.0-rc9 breaks UD

2011-10-14 Thread Christoph Lameter
Running ibv_ud_pingpong and ibc_uc_pingpong between two hosts. One with OFED 1.5.3.1 (Ubuntu LTS 10.04) and another on linux 3.1.0-rc9 (Same ubuntu version uderlying) with the upstream libraries. ibv_uc_pingpong OFED: # ibv_uc_pingpong local address: LID 0x000a, QPN 0x54004d, PSN 0x00637e, GI