Re: [Patch opensm] Allow for easily configuring multiple fabrics on one opensm server

On 3/1/2012 8:31 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: I would say we are simply getting to the point where we *know* we need opensm to handle more than one fabric from a single instance ;-) Why does a single OpenSM need to handle multiple subnets/fabrics ? What's the issue with running multiple OpenSMs with

Re: [Patch opensm] Allow for easily configuring multiple fabrics on one opensm server

- Original Message - On 3/1/2012 8:31 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: I would say we are simply getting to the point where we *know* we need opensm to handle more than one fabric from a single instance ;-) Why does a single OpenSM need to handle multiple subnets/fabrics ? What's the

Re: [Patch opensm] Allow for easily configuring multiple fabrics on one opensm server

On 3/5/2012 10:28 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: - Original Message - On 3/1/2012 8:31 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: I would say we are simply getting to the point where we *know* we need opensm to handle more than one fabric from a single instance ;-) Why does a single OpenSM need to handle

[PATCH] IB/iser: post initial receive buffers before sending the final login request

An iser target may send iscsi NO-OP PDUs as soon as it marks the iser iscsi session as fully operative. This means that there is window in time, where there are no posted receive buffers in the initiator side, such that its possible for the iser RC connection to break as of RNR NAK / retry errors.

RE: [PATCH] opensm: osm_subnet.c: Updated patch to add error-reporting to the parsing of opensm.conf

Alex - is this patch acceptable? My connectivity has been knocked for a loop by the transition to Intel and I'm not sure if you received this or not. -Original Message- From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mike Heinz Sent:

Re: [Patch opensm] Allow for easily configuring multiple fabrics on one opensm server

- Original Message - On 3/5/2012 10:28 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: - Original Message - On 3/1/2012 8:31 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: I would say we are simply getting to the point where we *know* we need opensm to handle more than one fabric from a single instance ;-) Why

[PATCH/RFC] mxl4_core: Scale size of MTT table with system RAM

From: Roland Dreier rol...@purestorage.com The current driver defaults to 1M MTT segments, where each segment holds 8 MTT entries. This limits the total memory registered to 8M * PAGE_SIZE which is 32GB with 4K pages. Since systems that have much more memory are pretty common now (at least

[PATCH/RFC] mxl4_core: Scale size of MTT table with system RAM

From: Roland Dreier rol...@purestorage.com The current driver defaults to 1M MTT segments, where each segment holds 8 MTT entries. This limits the total memory registered to 8M * PAGE_SIZE which is 32GB with 4K pages. Since systems that have much more memory are pretty common now (at least

[PATCH] infiniband-diags: saquery further error value clean up.

Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny wei...@llnl.gov --- src/saquery.c | 12 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/saquery.c b/src/saquery.c index 097d9dd..e5fdb25 100644 --- a/src/saquery.c +++ b/src/saquery.c @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static int

[PATCH][TRIVIAL] include/opensm/osm_subnet.h: fix comment typos

Signed-off-by: Albert Chu ch...@llnl.gov --- include/opensm/osm_subnet.h | 10 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/opensm/osm_subnet.h b/include/opensm/osm_subnet.h index e444ee5..219dfb3 100644 --- a/include/opensm/osm_subnet.h +++

mlx4 verbs question

Hi, It has been a long time since I looked at this but I was looking at ibv_modify_qp on an mlx4 system. I noticed the following which seems incorrect to me. From the RTS state issuing a modify qp with qp_attr_mask only set to state to the SQD state Returns qp_attr with qp_state = SQD but if you