----- Original Message -----
> On 3/1/2012 8:31 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > I would say we are simply getting to the point where we *know* we
> > need
> > opensm to handle more than one fabric from a single instance ;-)
>
> Why does a single OpenSM need to handle multiple subnets/fabrics ?
> What's the issue with running multiple OpenSMs with each handling
> it's
> own subnet/fabric ?
Because it wasn't built with the idea in mind of sharing logs or cache
directories, etc. Not to mention that the proliferation of files when
you start multiple instances of opensm is pretty insane (have you
counted how many different files opensm can be configured to require
now a days...).
--
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
