Re: [PATCH 05/14] IB/srp: Maintain a single connection per I_T nexus

2013-06-14 Thread Sebastian Riemer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14.06.2013 01:27, Vu Pham wrote: Bart Van Assche wrote: On 06/13/13 19:50, Vu Pham wrote: Hello Bart, +/** + * srp_conn_unique() - check whether the connection to a target is unique + */ +static bool srp_conn_unique(struct srp_host *host, +

Re: [PATCH 07/14] scsi_transport_srp: Add transport layer error handling

2013-06-14 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 06/13/13 21:43, Vu Pham wrote: Hello Bart, +What:/sys/class/srp_remote_ports/port-h:n/dev_loss_tmo +Date:September 1, 2013 +KernelVersion:3.11 +Contact:linux-s...@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org +Description:Number of seconds the SCSI layer will

Re: recommend setting for dev_loss_tmo and fast_io_fail_tmo

2013-06-14 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 06/13/13 20:21, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: P.S. In case of kernel 3.9.5 does i need you backported ib_srp driver or i can use mainline kernel drivers for faster reconnects? P.P.S. Can you provide me subject of e-mail or link to patches to switch off dev_loss_tmo? Hello Vasiliy, Does this mean

Re: [PATCH 05/14] IB/srp: Maintain a single connection per I_T nexus

2013-06-14 Thread Vu Pham
Hello Sebastian, On 14.06.2013 01:27, Vu Pham wrote: Bart Van Assche wrote: On 06/13/13 19:50, Vu Pham wrote: Hello Bart, +/** + * srp_conn_unique() - check whether the connection to a target is unique + */ +static bool srp_conn_unique(struct srp_host *host, +

Re: [PATCH 07/14] scsi_transport_srp: Add transport layer error handling

2013-06-14 Thread Vu Pham
Hello Bart, On 06/13/13 21:43, Vu Pham wrote: Hello Bart, +What:/sys/class/srp_remote_ports/port-h:n/dev_loss_tmo +Date:September 1, 2013 +KernelVersion:3.11 +Contact:linux-s...@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org +Description:Number of seconds the

Re: [PATCH for-next 0/4] IP based RoCE GID Addressing

2013-06-14 Thread Or Gerlitz
Jason Gunthorpe jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote: Can you talk abit about compatibility please? What happens when nodes with this patch are on the same network as nodes without it? The CM on the passive side would send a reject with the reason being invalid gid so this will not go

Re: [PATCH for-next 4/4] IB/core: Add RoCE IP based addressing extensions towards user space

2013-06-14 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Jason Gunthorpe jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:01:44PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: From: Matan Barak mat...@mellanox.com Add support for RoCE (IBoE) IP based addressing extensions towards user space. Extend INIT_QP_ATTR and

Re: Status of ummunot branch?

2013-06-14 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Jun 12, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Jason Gunthorpe jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote: Yes, it can, via MAP_FIXED. There are lots of fun tricks you can play using that. You're missing the point. Normal users (i.e., MPI users) don't do that. They call malloc() and they get what they get. The

Re: Status of ummunot branch?

2013-06-14 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:53:24PM +, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: On Jun 12, 2013, at 5:47 PM, Jason Gunthorpe jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote: Someone has to finish the ummunotify rewrite Roland started. Realistically MPI is going to be the only user, can someone from the