Re: [PATCH opensm 1/2] reduce log level for missing partition configuration file.

2013-10-22 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On 10/17/2013 7:10 AM, Bernd Schubert wrote: A missing non-mandatory file is not an error. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert bernd.schub...@itwm.fraunhofer.de Thanks. Applied. -- Hal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH opensm 2/2] Try default parition config if parsing the partitions.conf failed

2013-10-22 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Bernd, On 10/17/2013 7:10 AM, Bernd Schubert wrote: If partitions.conf is for some reasons invalid or empty, try again with the default configuration. This will re-use the default configuration created by prtn_make_default(), but osm_prtn_make_new() will automatically overwrite the

Re: [Patch v2 3/3] IB/cache: don't fill the cache with junk

2013-10-22 Thread Jack Morgenstein
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:12:54 -0400 Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote: I think I like my suggestion better: go back to having a full table, but use a bitmap to indicate valid entries and then use the bitmap to limit our comparisons in the find_cached* functions, and put the get_* funtions

Re: [PATCH/RFC] IB/core: Temporarily disable create_flow/destroy_flow uverbs

2013-10-22 Thread Matan Barak
On 21/10/2013 9:40 PM, Roland Dreier wrote: From: Yann Droneaud ydrone...@opteya.com The create_flow/destroy_flow uverbs and the associated extensions to the user-kernel verbs ABI are under review and are too experimental to freeze at this point. So userspace is not exposed to experimental

Re: [PATCH/RFC] IB/core: Temporarily disable create_flow/destroy_flow uverbs

2013-10-22 Thread Yann Droneaud
Hi, Le 21.10.2013 20:40, Roland Dreier a écrit : From: Yann Droneaud ydrone...@opteya.com The create_flow/destroy_flow uverbs and the associated extensions to the user-kernel verbs ABI are under review and are too experimental to freeze at this point. So userspace is not exposed to

RE: [PATCH RFC 2/9] IB/core: Introduce Signature Verbs API

2013-10-22 Thread Hefty, Sean
I don't think so, Signature MR simply describes a signature associated memory region i.e. it is a memory region that also defines some signature operation offload aside from normal RDMA (for example validate strip). SGL are used to publish several rkeys for the server/target/peer to

RE: [PATCH RFC 2/9] IB/core: Introduce Signature Verbs API

2013-10-22 Thread Hefty, Sean
Would we lose anything making this a new operation for the QP, versus trying to hook it into the existing ib_post_send call? If I understand correctly you are suggesting making it a verb? Well this operation is a fast-path operation - so I guess we will loose it in this case. Take SCSI

[PATCH 00/24] treewide: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table

2013-10-22 Thread Joe Perches
Joe Perches (24): arm: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table ia64: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table s390: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table tile: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table cdrom: Convert use of typedef

[PATCH 07/24] infiniband: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table

2013-10-22 Thread Joe Perches
This typedef is unnecessary and should just be removed. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches j...@perches.com --- drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c index b0f189b..3f93093 100644

Re: [PATCH 00/24] treewide: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table

2013-10-22 Thread David Daney
On 10/22/2013 03:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote: Joe Perches (24): arm: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table ia64: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table s390: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table tile: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to

Re: [PATCH 00/24] treewide: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table

2013-10-22 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 16:53 -0700, David Daney wrote: After all this work, why not go ahead and remove the typedef? That way people won't add more users of this abomination. Hi David. The typedef can't be removed until all the uses are gone. I've sent this before as a single large patch as