The transaction tests need both sides to send a sync message after running
the test. This ensures that all remote operations are complete before
dapltest deregeisters memory and disconnects the endpoints.
Without this logic, we see async errors on iwarp devices because a read
or write arrives
2014-02-04 18:19 GMT+04:00 Vasiliy Tolstov v.tols...@selfip.ru:
2014-02-04 Vasiliy Tolstov v.tols...@selfip.ru:
This is pretty much very old firmware, could you update it please with
the latest GA from the mellanox site and see if things smile back?
also send the lspci | grep -i Mellanox
2014-02-28 22:24 GMT+04:00 Vasiliy Tolstov v.tols...@selfip.ru:
This is pretty much very old firmware, could you update it please with
the latest GA from the mellanox site and see if things smile back?
also send the lspci | grep -i Mellanox
And after looking dmesg i see sometime early:
Hey Arlin,
This fix isn't quite correct: If one side finishes its transaction IO, then
posts the final sync SEND, but the peer hasn't finished with its transaction
IO, then the peer could post a READ request, for example, and then wait for the
READ completion. However the READ response would
On 2/26/2014 8:44 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
Hi-
Shirley Ma and I are reviving work on the NFS/RDMA client code base in the
Linux kernel. So far we’ve built and run functional tests to determine what is
working and what is broken.
One complication is the number of memory registration modes
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Wendy Cheng s.wendy.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
ni i...On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Tom Talpey t...@talpey.com wrote:
On 2/26/2014 8:44 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
Hi-
Shirley Ma and I are reviving work on the NFS/RDMA client code base in
the Linux kernel. So
Attention: Please, Kindly contact KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK immediately for your
compensation payment of (3MILLION UNITED STATE DOLLARS) via email:
Email:(servic...@kenya.ncommercialbnk.com) quote your payment Ref
No:KCB/00Y/2014 For purposes of immediate payment.
--
To unsubscribe from this
contact me for details of $21.4m transfer.
The information contained in this electronic communication is intended solely
for the individual(s) or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain
proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged information. Any review,
retransmission,
Hi Wendy-
On Feb 28, 2014, at 5:26 PM, Wendy Cheng s.wendy.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Wendy Cheng s.wendy.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
ni i...On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Tom Talpey t...@talpey.com wrote:
On 2/26/2014 8:44 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
Hi-
Shirley
