On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:27:12PM -0700, Jim Foraker wrote:
for zone work. My impression is that most IB admins want to be able to
run diagnostics from anywhere on the fabric, which implies much wider
deployment. For the most part, if the keyfile ends up on every host,
it's not all that
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 09:50 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 05:09:07PM -0800, Jim Foraker wrote:
I don't think using passwords for this sort of thing is really a good
idea. It has been shown again and again the extrapolating keys from
passwords does not stand
On 3/13/2012 12:35 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:31:50AM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On 3/9/2012 1:04 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
On 3/9/2012 12:09 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least
flexible model. If so, I think we need something more flexible as IBA
allows each port to have it's own
On 3/9/2012 1:04 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least
flexible model. If so, I think we need
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 05:09:07PM -0800, Jim Foraker wrote:
I don't think using passwords for this sort of thing is really a good
idea. It has been shown again and again the extrapolating keys from
passwords does not stand up. Better to design around a large true
random key (eg how
On 3/6/2012 5:12 PM, Jim Foraker wrote:
What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least
flexible model. If so, I think we need something more flexible as IBA
allows each port to have it's own different
What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least
flexible model. If so, I think we need something more flexible as IBA
allows each port to have it's own different mkey.
Is something more needed than
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:04:59 -0700
Jason Gunthorpe jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:04 -0800, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
single mkey for all ports in the subnet which is the simplest but least
flexible model. If so, I
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 12:32:55PM -0800, Jim Foraker wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:04 -0800, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
What mkey model is being proposed here ? It looks to me like it is a
single mkey for all ports in the
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 13:01 -0800, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 12:32:55PM -0800, Jim Foraker wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:04 -0800, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:59:58AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
What mkey model is being proposed here
Signed-off-by: Jim Foraker forak...@llnl.gov
---
include/infiniband/mad.h |2 ++
src/libibmad.map |2 ++
src/mad_internal.h |1 +
src/smp.c| 12
4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/infiniband/mad.h
13 matches
Mail list logo
