[PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Linus, This should be the last pull request for the 4.4 cycle. There are three fixes here. The first two were very small in terms of number of lines, the third is more lines of change than I like this late in the cycle, but there are positive test results from Avagotech and from my own test

[PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Linus, The following changes since commit 527e9316f8ec44bd53d90fb9f611fa752bb9: Linux 4.4-rc4 (2015-12-06 15:43:12 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dledford/rdma.git tags/for-linus for you to fetch changes up to

[PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Linus, This is my initial round of 4.4 merge window patches. There are a few other things I wish to get in for 4.4 that aren't in this pull, as this represents what has gone through merge/build/run testing and not what is the last few items for which testing is not yet complete. The

[PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Linus, It's late in the game, I know, but these fixes seemed important enough to warrant a late pull request. They all involve oopses or use after frees or corruptions. Explanation of each in the tag message. Thanks! The following changes since commit

[PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Linus, We have four batched up patches for the current rc kernel. Two of them are small fixes that are obvious. One of them is larger than I would like for a late stage rc pull, but we found an issue in the namespace lookup code related to RoCE and this works around the issue for now (we

[PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Linus, I have a few -rc fixes for you. One fix in particular, for the NFSoRDMA code, relied upon changes that went in during the 4.3 merge window to apply cleanly, but also relied on a group of related commits in this set, making it need to come through my tree. So I merged up to 4.3-rc2,

[PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Linus, The new hfi1 driver in staging/rdma has had a number of fixup patches since being added to the tree. This is the first batch of those fixes. The following changes since commit 447e9a4d27484175a84daaa8e03d35c650f443b7: IB/ehca: Deprecate driver, move to staging, schedule deletion

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On 9/9/2015 7:11 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: On 09/09/2015 12:10 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: Ok. I've merged it in my tree now, it's just waiting for the usual compile-test. Compile-test finished, and pushed

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:33:28AM CEST, torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: >On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: >> >> With a comment that said "I can carry this merge forward, no further >> action is necessary on your part". That combined with my lack of deep

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On 9/9/2015 9:41 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:33:28AM CEST, torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: With a comment that said "I can carry this merge forward, no further action is necessary on your part".

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Side note: it's very annoying to have Time Warner Cable decide to take your internet down in the middle of writing a reply :-/ On 09/08/2015 11:33 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: >> >> With a comment that said "I can carry this

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On 9/9/2015 11:09 AM, Matan Barak wrote: On 9/9/2015 9:41 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:33:28AM CEST, torvalds@linux-foundation.orgwrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: With a comment that said "I can carry this merge forward, no

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On 09/09/2015 11:44 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Yes, I see them, thanks for the links. > > It would have helped if the commit logs had had a record of this > somehow (ie a "Cc: netdev" etc so that I could tell during the merge > that this was actually something the networking people knew about).

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Ok. I've merged it in my tree now, it's just waiting for the usual > compile-test. Compile-test finished, and pushed out. Can somebody check that my conversion of roce_gid_mgmt.c actually _works_ though?

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: > > Me telling Matan to Cc: netdev on patches related to their subsystem: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma=143398479529819=4 > > Above was v5 of the patchset. Both the v6 and v7 of the patchset had > netdev Cc:ed on the

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On 09/09/2015 12:10 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: >> >> Ok. I've merged it in my tree now, it's just waiting for the usual >> compile-test. > > Compile-test finished, and pushed out. > > Can somebody check

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On 09/09/2015 05:45 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Doug, > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 23:08:47 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote: >> >> On 09/08/2015 08:35 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >>> (b) you rebased your commit series after it >> >> Yes. I rebased my tree a bunch of times. I

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Doug, On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:32:17 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote: > > On 09/09/2015 05:45 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > The only branch of yours that I have ever fetched is > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dledford/rdma.git#for-next Turns out that that

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Doug, On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 23:08:47 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote: > > On 09/08/2015 08:35 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > (b) you rebased your commit series after it > > Yes. I rebased my tree a bunch of times. I keep two different git > repos. The one on kernel.org and

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: > > Matan Barak (5): > net: Add info for NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event Why the hell is this coming in through the infiniband tree? Especially with the networking tree having done the same thing differently? I see that

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > This needs a good explanation, because for now this pull request is dead to > me. Just to clarify: it's really the combination of: (a) you were told about this (b) you rebased your commit series after

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > > Because the tree isn't buildable, let alone testable, without it. You're missing the ENTIRE POINT. > Well, I expected it to be handled without much effort on your part and > the existing network infrastructure to be

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On 09/08/2015 11:08 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: >> >> Because the tree isn't buildable, let alone testable, without it. > > You're missing the ENTIRE POINT. > >> Well, I expected it to be handled without much effort on

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On 09/08/2015 08:21 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: >> >> Matan Barak (5): >> net: Add info for NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event > > Why the hell is this coming in through the infiniband tree? Especially > with the networking

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On 09/08/2015 08:35 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: >> >> This needs a good explanation, because for now this pull request is dead to >> me. > > Just to clarify: it's really the combination of: > > (a) you were

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > > With a comment that said "I can carry this merge forward, no further > action is necessary on your part". That combined with my lack of deep > internal knowledge of what it is that Stephen is doing made me go "Ok, > he

[PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Linus, This is a fairly sizeable set of changes. I've put them through a decent amount of testing prior to sending the pull request due to that. There are still a few fixups that I know are coming, but I wanted to go ahead and get the big, sizable chunk into your hands sooner rather than

[PULL REQUEST] please pull rdma.git

Hi Linus, I have a single bug fix for you to pull: The following changes since commit b8f5595eb96c9fce1c907d13e89581e5061edf2e: RDMA/ocrdma: update ocrdma module license string (2015-07-24 11:34:41 -0400) are available in the git repository at:

[PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

The following changes since commit d8b2ba7c5928173fe1c12bd2545f5ed85d1c3c7a: IB/core: Destroy ocrdma_dev_id IDR on module exit (2015-07-14 13:20:16 -0400) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dledford/rdma.git tags/for-linus for you to fetch

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:07:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: Hmm. I've pulled this, but quite frankly, I don't think this was appropriate for post-merge-window. It's not at all obvious that that rdma_cap_ib_switch helper thing is a bugfix, and that goes for a few of the other commits too.

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Doug, the point is that there is no driver that even set the is_switch flag in-tree and I can't find a publicly available one elsewhere either. So it's plain and simple dead code. I'll send a patch to kill this untestable code off once I find a little spare time. -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On 07/16/2015 08:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Hi Doug, the point is that there is no driver that even set the is_switch flag in-tree and I can't find a publicly available one elsewhere either. Try looking on Mellanox.com for their source code. I know they use upstream linux kernels as

RE: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

...@dev.mellanox.co.il] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 9:23 AM To: Doug Ledford Cc: Christoph Hellwig; Linus Torvalds; linux-rdma; Suri Shelvapille Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git On 7/16/2015 8:50 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: On 07/16/2015 08:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Hi Doug

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:59:37PM +, Suri Shelvapille wrote: Thanks Hal, we indeed do. And we would like to continue to do so, be it by setting a flag or otherwise. I hope removing that functionality from the kernel is not an option, as it would be a major inconvenience for us. Hi Suri,

RE: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

-Original Message- From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:02 AM To: Suri Shelvapille Cc: Hal Rosenstock; Doug Ledford; Christoph Hellwig; Linus Torvalds; linux-rdma Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:59:37PM +

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On 07/16/2015 03:55 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:07:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: Hmm. I've pulled this, but quite frankly, I don't think this was appropriate for post-merge-window. It's not at all obvious that that rdma_cap_ib_switch helper thing is a bugfix,

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote: This comprises a number of various fixes (including the ones you've requested): Hmm. I've pulled this, but quite frankly, I don't think this was appropriate for post-merge-window. It's not at all obvious that that

[PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Linus, This comprises a number of various fixes (including the ones you've requested): The following changes since commit bc197aad0daa: Linux 4.2-rc2 (2015-07-12 15:10:30 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dledford/rdma.git

[PULL REQUEST] Please pull rdma.git

Hi Linus, This should hopefully be the last request for 4.1-rc for the RDMA stack. It contains some late ocrdma fixes that I'm including because they are small and self contained. It also contains two bug fixes that are simple and easily verified.