On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky sas...@voltaire.com wrote:
On 11:38 Thu 12 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
We've cared for several years now (babbling port policy was introduced
into the master on 7/6/07) but this issue still persists. Are you
saying no reports for these
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik
klit...@dev.mellanox.co.il wrote:
Hi Sasha,
I noticed that OpenSM doesn't send InformInfo on traps 129/130/131.
This is what osm_trap_rcv.c is doing:
322: static void trap_rcv_process_request(IN osm_sm_t * sm,
323:
On 08:46 Thu 12 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Any particular reason why there's no reporting of these traps?
AFAIK it's been this way for at least the last 5 or 6 years.
Yes, this is what I found too tracking down git/svn history.
A practical consideration in changing this is that
On 11:38 Thu 12 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
We've cared for several years now (babbling port policy was introduced
into the master on 7/6/09) but this issue still persists. Are you
saying no reports for these traps until the trap rate is obeyed ?
If existing trap rate filtering in OpenSM
