Simplified iWARP Consumer Library

2010-02-15 Thread Philip Frey
Dear all, as announced last week (on gene...@lists.openfabrics.org), I have developed a shared library to simplify iWARP/RDMA application development on Linux in the course of my PhD. The library, called libiwarp, is based on libibverbs and librdmacm - it is essentially a set of wrappers to hi

Re: Simplified iWARP Consumer Library

2010-02-15 Thread Or Gerlitz
Philip Frey wrote: as announced last week (on gene...@lists.openfabrics.org) [...] I would be very interested in your feedback! The general list isn't functional since last fall, as of such, your announcement wasn't seen by any of the non directly CCed recipients... can you please resend it her

Re: Simplified iWARP Consumer Library

2010-02-15 Thread Philip Frey
Dear all, I was made aware of the fact that the gene...@lists.openfabrics.org mailinglist was deprecated and that my initial post about the iWARP library did not reach you. (The general list is still linked on openfabrics.org without a notice of it being deprecated.) Please, find below a cop

RE: Simplified iWARP Consumer Library

2010-03-05 Thread Sean Hefty
>as announced last week (on gene...@lists.openfabrics.org), I have developed a >shared library to simplify iWARP/RDMA application development on Linux in the >course of my PhD. The library, called libiwarp, is based on libibverbs and >librdmacm - it is essentially a set of wrappers to hide some of

Re: Simplified iWARP Consumer Library

2010-03-05 Thread Philip Frey
I'll have to look into that. So far, the library was intended as an add-on to the existing code with the option to fall back to the original API if need be. Which of the features would you want to see in librdmacm? I guess the integration of the cm_id and qp as well as the simpler (synchronous) c

RE: Simplified iWARP Consumer Library

2010-03-05 Thread Sean Hefty
>I'll have to look into that. So far, the library was intended as an add-on >to the existing code with the option to fall back to the original API if >need be. I think we keep this concept. >Which of the features would you want to see in librdmacm? I guess the >integration of the cm_id and qp as

RE: Simplified iWARP Consumer Library

2010-03-11 Thread Sean Hefty
>>Which of the features would you want to see in librdmacm? I guess the >>integration of the cm_id and qp as well as the simpler (synchronous) >connection >>establishment and teardown functionality would fit. However, all cm events >>will thereafter be handled within the library rather than being p

Re: Simplified iWARP Consumer Library

2010-03-11 Thread philip . frey
o.com Cc: Bernard Metzler Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: Simplified iWARP Consumer Library Sent: Mar 11, 2010 23:49 >>Which of the features would you want to see in librdmacm? I guess the >>integration of the cm_id and qp as well as the simpler (synchronous) >connection