Re: [PATCH] gpio: dwapb: Rework support for 1 interrupt per port A GPIO

2018-05-23 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Phil Edworthy wrote: > Treat DT and ACPI the same as much as possible. Note that we can't use > platform_get_irq() to get the DT interrupts as they are in the port > sub-node and hence do not have an associated platform device. > >

RE: [PATCH] gpio: dwapb: Rework support for 1 interrupt per port A GPIO

2018-05-23 Thread Phil Edworthy
Hi Simon, On 23 May 2018 10:12 Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 09:52:44AM +0100, Phil Edworthy wrote: > > Treat DT and ACPI the same as much as possible. Note that we can't use > > platform_get_irq() to get the DT interrupts as they are in the port > > sub-node and hence do not have

Re: [PATCH] gpio: dwapb: Rework support for 1 interrupt per port A GPIO

2018-05-23 Thread Simon Horman
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 09:52:44AM +0100, Phil Edworthy wrote: > Treat DT and ACPI the same as much as possible. Note that we can't use > platform_get_irq() to get the DT interrupts as they are in the port > sub-node and hence do not have an associated platform device. > > This also fixes a