> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 08:35:20PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:08:42PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:06:22PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > That fixes it for me:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tested-by: Hans Ve
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 08:35:20PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:08:42PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:06:22PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > That fixes it for me:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tested-by: Hans Verkuil
> > > > > >
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:08:42PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:06:22PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >
> > > > > That fixes it for me:
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested-by: Hans Verkuil
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW, your patch is garbled and I had to manually make the change
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:06:22PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> > > > That fixes it for me:
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Hans Verkuil
> > > >
> > > > BTW, your patch is garbled and I had to manually make the change (not a
> > > > big
> > > > deal for a simple change like this).
> > > >
> > > That fixes it for me:
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Hans Verkuil
> > >
> > > BTW, your patch is garbled and I had to manually make the change (not a
> > > big
> > > deal for a simple change like this).
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for testing. I just copy-pasted the patch, so this was somehow
> > e
[CC Super H maintainers: Sato-san and Rich Felker]
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:03:38PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 02/29/2016 09:24 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > >> On 02/27/2016 03:28 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > >>> Hi Hans!
> > >>>
> > >>> On 02/27/2016 03:20 PM, Geer
> On 02/29/2016 09:24 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 02/27/2016 03:28 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >>> Hi Hans!
> >>>
> >>> On 02/27/2016 03:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > I noticed that 4.1 was ok and v4.2 wasn't, so I did a git bisect and
> > ended up with
> >
On 02/29/2016 09:24 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 02/27/2016 03:28 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> Hi Hans!
>>>
>>> On 02/27/2016 03:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> I noticed that 4.1 was ok and v4.2 wasn't, so I did a git bisect and
> ended up with
> commit 8222dbe2
> On 02/27/2016 03:28 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Hi Hans!
> >
> > On 02/27/2016 03:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> I noticed that 4.1 was ok and v4.2 wasn't, so I did a git bisect and
> >>> ended up with
> >>> commit 8222dbe21e79338de92d5e1956cd1e3994cc9f93 (sched/preempt,
Hi Hans!
On 02/27/2016 03:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> I noticed that 4.1 was ok and v4.2 wasn't, so I did a git bisect and ended
>> up with
>> commit 8222dbe21e79338de92d5e1956cd1e3994cc9f93 (sched/preempt, mm/fault:
>> Decouple
>> preemption from the page fault logic) as the culprit.
I
On 02/27/2016 03:28 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Hans!
>
> On 02/27/2016 03:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> I noticed that 4.1 was ok and v4.2 wasn't, so I did a git bisect and ended
>>> up with
>>> commit 8222dbe21e79338de92d5e1956cd1e3994cc9f93 (sched/preempt, mm/fault:
>>> D
CC linux-sh
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The last time I used my ecovec sh7724 board was with kernel 4.1 and that
> worked fine.
>
> But I needed to do some more testing with the mainline kernel and this
> generated this
> error:
>
> [ cut here
Hi all,
The last time I used my ecovec sh7724 board was with kernel 4.1 and that worked
fine.
But I needed to do some more testing with the mainline kernel and this
generated this
error:
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at arch/sh/mm/kmap.c:47!
Kernel BUG: 003e [#1]
CPU: 0 PID:
13 matches
Mail list logo
