Hi Vinod, Hi Russell,
On 11 December 2014 at 11:42, Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org wrote:
On 11 December 2014 at 10:17, Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:48:04PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
As Russell pointed out, that ain't the case either.
So we are yet
On 11 December 2014 at 10:17, Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:48:04PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
As Russell pointed out, that ain't the case either.
So we are yet to figure out benefits of having explicit
issue_pending() after tx_submit().
callback
On 8 December 2014 at 18:37, Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 12:31:01PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
It does, though, create an awkward situation when a channel is
active while new requests are submitted - why would the channel want
to stop after current transfer
On 5 December 2014 at 20:48, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 01:21:37PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
because the reasoning above seems incorrect considering the following
documentation...
Documentation/crypto/async-tx-api.txt says
On 3 December 2014 at 10:17, Padma Venkat padma@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lars,
[snip]
+
+ ret = dma_cookie_status(chan, cookie, txstate);
+ if (ret == DMA_COMPLETE || !txstate)
+ return ret;
+
+ used = txstate-used;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(pch-lock, flags);
+ sar =
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Lukasz Majewski
l.majew...@samsung.com wrote:
Actually these values are not for PLL, but for the dividers.
If you see below, the PLL rate setting is done through clk_set_rate()
going via CCF. But I found an issue if the divider values are set via
clk_set_rate
changed, 157 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
Acked-by : Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
is present
(idea from Jassi Brar). It fixes the issue on ARM EXYNOS
platforms using DT where pdma controller erroneously was used
for DMA_MEMCPY operations instead of mdma one (it seems to work
correctly but at the cost of worse performance).
Sorry, we need to change it as per new generic dma
On 30 October 2012 14:51, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
b.zolnier...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 29 October 2012 22:45:48 Jassi Brar wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
b.zolnier...@samsung.com wrote:
* Add device tree (DT) property (pl330,dma-memcpy
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
b.zolnier...@samsung.com wrote:
* Add device tree (DT) property (pl330,dma-memcpy) for DMA_MEMCPY
capability and instead of setting this capability unconditionally
in pl330_probe() do it only when property is present.
Perhaps we
+0xac/0xe0) from [c00102f8]
(cpu_idle+0xac/0xf0)
[ 368.49] [c00102f8] (cpu_idle+0xac/0xf0) from [c04796a0]
(start_kernel+0x28c/0x294)
Cc: Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
Cc: Vinod Koul vinod.k...@linux.intel.com
Cc: Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej
-by: Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Inderpal Singh
inderpal.si...@linaro.org wrote:
Now, if we have to check if any client is using the channel and then
decide. We will have to traverse the channel list twice once to check
the usage and second time to delete the nodes from the list if we go
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Inderpal Singh
inderpal.si...@linaro.org wrote:
How about conditionally DMA_TERMINATE_ALL and free resources like below ?
@@ -3017,9 +3017,11 @@ static int __devexit pl330_remove(struct
amba_device *adev)
/* Remove the channel */
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Inderpal Singh
inderpal.si...@linaro.org wrote:
In probe, memory for multiple DMA descriptors were being allocated at once
and then it was being split and added into DMA pool one by one. The address
of this memory allocation is not being saved anywhere. To free
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Inderpal Singh
inderpal.si...@linaro.org wrote:
Since peripheral channel resources are not being allocated at probe,
no need to flush the channels and free the resources in remove function.
Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh inderpal.si...@linaro.org
---
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Inderpal Singh
inderpal.si...@linaro.org wrote:
Since 0 is not considered as error at dmaengine level, return ENOMEM
from pl330_alloc_chan_resources in case of failure.
Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh inderpal.si...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Jassi Brar jassisinghb
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Thomas Abraham
thomas.abra...@linaro.org wrote:
The set_level callback in the controller data, which is used to configure
the slave select line, cannot be supported when migrating the driver to
device tree based discovery. Since all the platforms currently use
hierarchy of spi controller bus clock
ARM: Exynos5: Add spi clock support
spi: s3c64xx: add device tree support
Look ok to me. FWIW, Acked-by: Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord
On 9 May 2012 14:50, Heiko Stübner he...@sntech.de wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2012, 00:04:51 schrieb Thomas Abraham:
The set_level callback in the controller data, which is used to configure
the slave select line, cannot be supported when migrating the driver to
device tree based discovery.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Heiko Stübner he...@sntech.de wrote:
[@jassi: I know that you do not work at this stuff any longer, but I included
you in the list of recipients in the hope that you might be able to give me a
pointer on where to look for the culprit of the problem :-) ]
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com wrote:
Sadly, what a mess!!!
Jassi, you don't own the copyright, your company did, as they employed
you to do the job. So both your and Kukjin are not correct in claiming
the copyright!!
Read the thread again.
Nobody is
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
* Copyright (c) 2012 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
* http://www.samsung.com
*
* Copyright (C) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
* Jaswinder Singh jassi.b...@samsung.com
*
The following is more
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
* Copyright (c) 2012 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
* http://www.samsung.com
*
* Copyright (C) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
* Jaswinder Singhjassi.b...@samsung.com
*
The following is more
On 22 February 2012 22:58, Heiko Stübner he...@sntech.de wrote:
No objections on the patch, but please use 'git format-patch -M' when
moving files so that we can see which parts have changed in the process.
the results of -M look really nice, thanks for the hint and I will try to
remember it
them now.
Basically this patch merges arch/arm/common/pl330.c into
drivers/dma/pl330.c driver and removes useless exported
symbol, externed function and so on.
The newer pl330 driver tested on SMDKV310 and SMDK4212 boards
Cc: Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
Cc: Russell King rmk+ker
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
And since she has been doing these updates on behalf of Samsung, she has
added attribution to Samsung also (which you never did while at Samsung).
What the bloody fuck ?!!
Can't you read this ? .
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Can't you read this ? .
As I know, the Copyright can belong to a person or company. See my patches in
mainline. I meant that. Of course, it depends on writer.
-
/*
prevent the driver from sending more requests if it
didn't guess correctly.
Signed-off-by: Javi Merino javi.mer...@arm.com
Cc: Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/common/pl330.c | 116
---
1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 67
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
From: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
Cc: Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
Cc: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
Cc: Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
Signed-off
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Javi Merino javi.mer...@arm.com wrote:
What about properly tracking what we have sent to the DMA? Something
like the following (warning *ugly* and untested code ahead, may eat your
kitten):
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/pl330.c b/arch/arm/common/pl330.c
On 11 December 2011 20:39, Javi Merino javi.mer...@arm.com wrote:
What about properly tracking what we have sent to the DMA? Something
like the following (warning *ugly* and untested code ahead, may eat your
kitten):
Yeah, this is like I said 'marker' method. Though we can clean it up a
Hi Javi,
On 9 December 2011 17:28, Javi Merino javi.mer...@arm.com wrote:
Javi, could you please check if you too get the memcpy failure with
dmatest ?
Ok, I think I've just reproduced it in my end with the kernel's dmatest
module. After the first transaction it looks like the dma test
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Javi Merino javi.mer...@arm.com wrote:
I think the best solution would be to revert
ee3f615819404a9438b2dd01b7a39f276d2737f2 and go back to my original
patch (in the beginning of this thread):
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/133110
What
On 29 November 2011 15:23, Javi Merino javi.mer...@arm.com wrote:
On Samsung's Exynos4 platform, while testing audio playback with
i2s
interface, the above change causes the playback to freeze. The
_thrd_active(thrd) call always returns '1' and hence _start(thrd)
is
not getting called.
If
On 14 September 2011 16:47, Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com wrote:
The changelog for [PATCH v8 04/16] is misleading - we don't need any
modification for the reason mentioned in changelog. But the modification
has positive side-effect of preventing callbacks during terminate_all which
is no
invoked is pl330 channel instance (and avoid any incorrect
access of chan-private in a system with multiple types of DMA
drivers).
Suggested-by: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham thomas.abra...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
to the device node pointer and matches that
with channel's private data. If a match is found, the request id
from the client node and the 'chan_id' of the channel is matched.
A channel is found if both the values match.
Cc: Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
Cc: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
On 7 September 2011 12:53, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Jassi Brar wrote:
On 6 September 2011 17:57, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:52:19PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Boojin Kim boojin
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
Origianl code carries out the start operation after flush operation.
But start operation is not required for DMA_TERMINATE_ALL command.
So, This patch removes the unnecessary start operation and only carries out
the flush
On 6 September 2011 17:57, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:52:19PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
Origianl code carries out the start operation after flush operation
-by: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
Acked-by: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com
Cc: Dan Williams dan.j.willi...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
Acked-by: Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
This patch modifies device_control() to support both DMA_TERMINATE_ALL
and DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG command.
First, modify the flush control for DMA_TERMINATE_ALL command.
Second, add the slave configuration control for
);
}
This is a useless churn since v6.
Please fix this and add
Acked-by: Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
Jassi Brar [mailto:jassisinghb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 2:42 PM
To: Boojin Kim
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
s...@vger.kernel.org; Vinod Koul; Kukjin Kim; Dan Williams
'
is no longer required.
With the 'struct dma_pl330_peri' removed, the dma controller transfer
capabilities cannot be inferred any longer. Hence, the dma controller
capabilities is specified using platforme data.
Cc: Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
Cc: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
@@ -324,6 +362,9 @@ static void pl330_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan
*chan)
pl330_release_channel(pch-pl330_chid);
pch-pl330_chid = NULL;
+ if (pch-cyclic)
+
-by: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
Acked-by: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com
Cc: Dan Williams dan.j.willi...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
Acked-by: Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
Acked-by: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com
Cc: Dan Williams dan.j.willi...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
.
Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
Acked-by: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com
Cc: Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com
Cc: Liam Girdwood l...@ti.com
Acked-by: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
[kgene@samsung.com
/asm/hardware/pl330.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,217 +0,0 @@
-/* linux/include/asm/hardware/pl330.h
- *
- * Copyright (C) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- * Jaswinder Singh jassi.b...@samsung.com
While at it, please also modify the instances of author id to
'Jassi Brar jassisinghb
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
+static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *pl330_prep_dma_cyclic(
+ struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t len,
+ size_t period_len, enum dma_data_direction direction)
+{
+
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:33 PM, padma venkat padma@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jassi,
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Padmavathi Venna padm...@samsung.com wrote:
SPI driver is modified to lookup the bus clock using
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Padmavathi Venna padm...@samsung.com wrote:
SPI driver is modified to lookup the bus clock using the
alias name instead of getting clock name and clock
number from platform data.
Cool.
Driver is modified to get the best source clock among the
available source
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
This patch adds to support DMA generic API to transfer raw
SPI data. Basiclly the spi driver uses DMA generic API if
architecture supports it. Otherwise, uses Samsung specific
S3C-PL330 APIs.
Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Heiko Stübner he...@sntech.de wrote:
Am Montag 08 August 2011, 19:47:58 schrieb Jassi Brar:
Btw, this spi driver is for S3C64xx(with pl080) and S5P(with pl330)
series, both of which
have DMAENGINE drivers. May be it could be directly switched to using
those
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
This patch modifies to merge the dma control code.
Original s3c64xx spi driver has each dma control code for rx and tx channel.
This patch merges these dma control codes into one.
With this patch, a dma setup function
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
static void dma_enqueue(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
struct runtime_data *prtd = substream-runtime-private_data;
dma_addr_t pos = prtd-dma_pos;
unsigned int limit;
- int ret;
+
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Chanwoo Choi cw00.c...@samsung.com wrote:
This patch update runtime PM for PL330 DMAC to reduce power consumption.
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi cw00.c...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
The following patch support
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
Cc: Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com
Cc: Dan Williams dan.j.willi...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
Acked-by: Jassi Brar jassisinghb
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
Jassi Brar wrote:
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:34 AM
To: Boojin Kim
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
s...@vger.kernel.org; Vinod Koul; Dan Williams; Kukjin Kim; Grant
Likely; Mark Brown
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Vinod Koul vk...@infradead.org wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:57 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Here's an updated patch.
8--
From: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
DMAEngine: Improve slave/cyclic documentation
Improve the
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
1. Arrange for individual DMA engine drivers to provide a filter
function - eg, pl08x_filter_id() for pl08x channels.
2. Have the filter function check chan-device-dev-driver == its
own struct
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
Jassi Brar Wrote:
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 8:52 PM
To: Boojin Kim
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
s...@vger.kernel.org; Vinod Koul; Dan Williams; Kukjin Kim; Grant
Likely; Mark Brown
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
This patch adds DMA_CYCLIC capability that is used for audio driver.
DMA driver with DMA_CYCLIC capability reuses the dma requests that
were submitted through tx_submit().
Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
index 4d79519..cb170a6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
@@ -300,6 +300,14 @@ config S3C_PL330_DMA
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
+
+static bool pl330_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
+{
+ struct dma_pl330_peri *peri = (struct dma_pl330_peri *)chan-private;
+ unsigned dma_ch = (unsigned)param;
+
+ if (peri-peri_id !=
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/dma.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/dma.c
index 564bb53..e1c00cf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/dma.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/dma.c
@@ -21,151 +21,250 @@
* Foundation, Inc., 675
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
This patch removes the samsung specific enum type 's3c2410_dmasrc'
and uses 'dma_data_direction' instead.
Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
Acked-by: Jassi
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
Jassi Brar wrote:
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 2:00 PM
To: Boojin Kim
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org;
Vinod Koul; Dan Williams; Kukjin Kim
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 03-1/13
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:47:49AM +0530, Jassi
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
PL330 has fixed channels to peripherals.
So FIFO addresses(burst_sz too?) should already be set via platform data.
Client drivers shouldn't bother.
That's utter crap, and isn't what the DMA engine API
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:42:40PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
Does your hardware have a hardware block from the device
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
---
drivers/dma/pl330.c | 53 +-
1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 14
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
Cc: Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com
Cc: Dan Williams dan.j.willi...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
Acked-by: Jassi Brar jassisinghb
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
---
drivers/dma/pl330.c | 53 +-
1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 14
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Boojin Kim boojin@samsung.com wrote:
- pl330_tasklet((unsigned long) pch);
+ list_splice_tail_init(list, pdmac-desc_pool);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(pch-lock, flags);
+ break;
+ case
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Giridhar Maruthy
giridhar.maru...@linaro.org wrote:
Using 256fs or 512fs will result in distortion of 24-bit
audio samples. This is because the lrclk generated is not
proper. Using 384 fs generates proper output.
Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 6:27 AM, boojin boojin@samsung.com wrote:
Jassi Brar wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Chanho Park parkc...@gmail.com wrote:
Kukjin Kim kgene.kim at samsung.com writes:
(snip)
+ if (slave_config-direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:51:43PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Montag 04 Juli 2011, 19:02:17 schrieb Grant Likely:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:59:11PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Montag 04
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:46:47PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
Ideally, like PL330 for S5P, drivers/dma/pl080 should be enabled
for s3c64xx And new generic dma api drivers written for S3C24xx in
drivers/dma
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:29 AM, padma venkat padma@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jassi,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:16 AM, padma venkat padma@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Tony Nadackal ton
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Padmavathi Venna padm...@samsung.com wrote:
Fixed the bug in transmission status check for 64 bytes FIFO
level.
Signed-off-by: Padmavathi Venna padm...@samsung.com
---
drivers/spi/spi_s3c64xx.c | 4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Padmavathi Venna padm...@samsung.com wrote:
This patchset does the following:
1. Move duplicated code to common place
[PATCH 1/7] ARM: SAMSUNG: Move SPI device definitions to plat-samsung
SPI platform devices are defined in respective machine folder of
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 08:25:19AM -0400, Padmavathi Venna wrote:
SPI Clocks were defined in dev-spi.c of machine specific folder.
To make SPI devices common across all SoCs,dev-spi.c is moved
from machine
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:35 PM, padma venkat padma@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Padmavathi Venna padm...@samsung.com
wrote:
Fixed the bug in transmission status check for 64 bytes FIFO
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:57 PM, padma venkat padma@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Jassi Brar jassisinghb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Padmavathi Venna padm...@samsung.com
wrote:
This patchset does the following:
1. Move duplicated code
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Sangwook Lee sangwook@linaro.org wrote:
Function declaration differs between file:s3c-pl330.c and file:dma.h
and SPARSE (Documentation/sparse.txt) gives error messages
Signed-off-by: Sangwook Lee sangwook@linaro.org
Acked-by: Jassi Brar jassisinghb
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:16 AM, padma venkat padma@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Tony Nadackal ton...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Padma,
With regards to your patch, even though one can check the tx done status
using the TX_DONE bit, the present macro itself would
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Sangbeom Kim sbki...@samsung.com wrote:
+#define AHB_INTENLVL0 (1 24)
+#define AHB_LVL0INT (1 20)
+#define AHB_CLRLVL0INT (1 16)
+#define AHB_DMARLD (1 5)
+#define AHB_INTMASK (1 3)
+#define AHB_DMAEN
*smdkv310_devices[]
__initdata = {
exynos4_device_pd[PD_CAM],
exynos4_device_pd[PD_TV],
exynos4_device_pd[PD_GPS],
+ exynos4_device_spdif,
exynos4_device_sysmmu,
exynos4_device_pcm0,
samsung_asoc_dma,
Acked-by: Jassi Brar jassisinghb
(MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDKC110 ||
MACH_SMDKV210)
+ depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG (MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDKC110 ||
MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKV310)
select SND_SAMSUNG_SPDIF
help
Say Y if you want to add support for SoC S/PDIF audio on the SMDK.
Acked-by: Jassi Brar
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Sangbeom Kim sbki...@samsung.com wrote:
Change platform driver to support internal dma
for smdk_wm8994 and smdk_wm8580
Signed-off-by: Sangbeom Kim sbki...@samsung.com
---
NAK.
It will break the most common user - SMDK6410, as s3c6410 doesn't have any
I2S
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Sangbeom Kim sbki...@samsung.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
NAK.
It will break the most common user - SMDK6410, as s3c6410 doesn't have any
I2S internal DMA.
Please try to test the changes before submitting. I know it's boring
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Sangbeom Kim sbki...@samsung.com wrote:
I2S in Exynos4 and S5PC110(S5PV210) has a internal dma.
It can be used low power audio mode and 2nd channel transfer.
For my convenience, could you please tell how does it differ from my
original implementation? Most
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:56:45PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Sangbeom Kim sbki...@samsung.com wrote:
I only focused on S5PV210 and S5PV310.
I didn't consider s3c and s5p
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Sangbeom Kim sbki...@samsung.com wrote:
case 2:
+ if (substream-stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
+ i2s-dma_playback.dma_size = 4;
+ else
+ i2s-dma_capture.dma_size = 4;
+
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:18 PM, root alim.akh...@samsung.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: alim.akhtar alim.akh...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/configs/exynos4_defconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/configs/s5p64x0_defconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/configs/s5pc100_defconfig | 1 +
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Kyungmin Park kmp...@infradead.org wrote:
As I know there's are PL330 DMA implementation by
MODULE_AUTHOR(Jaswinder Singh jassi.b...@samsung.com);
Thanks for CC'ing me, though my current contact is
jaswinder.si...@linaro.org or jassisinghb...@gmail.com
Perhaps I
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:39:43PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
Unfortunately, no. There are some features of Samsung's DMA API that
the drivers have come to rely upon.
Besides, I am not particularly a fan
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
