change this mind for long time.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
or Have to turn on the clock of power domain always?
I didn't say like that.
I think that it is to happen unnecessary power consumption.
I don't think, when the power of block/domain is downed, does it happen
_really_ meaningful power
the almost
same codes at each board.
Otherwise looks good.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
+
/* Last */
platform_add_devices(universal_devices, ARRAY_SIZE(universal_devices));
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/devs.h
b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/devs.h
index
On 11/15/11, KyongHo Cho pullip@samsung.com wrote:
This is the System MMU driver and IOMMU API implementation for
Exynos SOC platforms. Exynos platforms has more than 10 System
MMUs dedicated for each multimedia accellerators.
The System MMU driver is already in arc/arm/plat-s5p but it is
On 11/3/11, Joonyoung Shim jy0922.s...@samsung.com wrote:
11/03/2011 04:46 PM, Kukjin Kim 쓴 글:
Joonyoung Shim wrote:
11/03/2011 10:59 AM, Kukjin Kim 쓴 글:
Joonyoung Shim wrote:
PWM timers use pclk(timers clk) as parent clk. If this pclk is the
disabled state when PWM driver is probed, then it
On 11/3/11, Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com wrote:
On 11/3/11, Joonyoung Shim jy0922.s...@samsung.com wrote:
11/03/2011 04:46 PM, Kukjin Kim 쓴 글:
Joonyoung Shim wrote:
11/03/2011 10:59 AM, Kukjin Kim 쓴 글:
Joonyoung Shim wrote:
PWM timers use pclk(timers clk) as parent clk
On 11/3/11, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Kyungmin Park wrote:
On 11/3/11, Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com wrote:
On 11/3/11, Joonyoung Shim jy0922.s...@samsung.com wrote:
11/03/2011 04:46 PM, Kukjin Kim 쓴 글:
Joonyoung Shim wrote:
11/03/2011 10:59 AM, Kukjin Kim 쓴 글
);
+ }
+
+ /*
* Synchronise with the boot thread.
*/
spin_lock(boot_lock);
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Kukjin and Arnd,
If there's chance to merge for 3.1 bugfix. It's required to run 2nd
GPIO banks for exynos4210.
and it should be applied for stable tree also.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Marek Szyprowski
m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
Offsets of the irq
Hi,
As you decide to rename the mach name, how to change the board name together?
Historically samsung use the mach- prefix for board name, but others
are use the board- prefix.
So let's use the same convention as others?
How do you think?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:21
it and support OF features.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
+
static struct platform_driver sdhci_s3c_driver = {
.probe = sdhci_s3c_probe,
.remove = __devexit_p(sdhci_s3c_remove),
+ .id_table = sdhci_s3c_driver_ids,
.suspend = sdhci_s3c_suspend
the SAMSUNG_RES_* series macro.
but if you use the DEFINED_RES_* series directly. it's easy to find
out at real codes.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
+
+
struct s3c24xx_uart_resources {
struct resource *resources;
unsigned long nr_resources;
--
1.7.1
Hi,
I'm afraid to change machine directory name again. mach-s5pv310 -
mach-exynos4 - mach-exynos.
As I remember linus blamed the renaming the file names are happened
frequently at ARM
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
2011/10/2 Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com:
The arch/arm/mach-exynos4 directory
as universal_c210 does.
Note that de-select the MCT timer since EVT0 doesn't have it.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
Regards,
Subash
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc
in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Subash Patel subas...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:07 PM, Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Subash Patelsubas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to boot linux version in subject on SMDKV310 board[EVT0].
The booting stops
Hi,
As I know, CONSISTENT_DMA_SIZE is removed, please use the updated APIs.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Hatim Ali hatim...@samsung.com wrote:
Change the consistent DMA allocation to 8MB to support the
TVOUT driver.
NOTE: Once CMA support is merged
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Kukjin Kim wrote:
Kyungmin Park wrote:
Hi,
It's required for boot universal c210 w/ EVT0 chip.
Can you include it at 3.1 fixed branch?
Sure, will apply into samsung-fixes for 3.1.
Unfortunately, it happens
Hi,
It's required for boot universal c210 w/ EVT0 chip.
Can you include it at 3.1 fixed branch?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Marek Szyprowski
m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
Commit 069d4e743 removed support for local timers and forced to use MCT as
event source
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com wrote:
Erase unit size of high capacity is multiple of 512KiB not 1024KiB.
Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com
---
drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 2 +-
1 files
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
Nitpick: see below comments and typo.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com wrote:
EXT_CSD[248] includes the default maximum timeout for CMD6.
This field is added at eMMC4.5 Spec. And it can be used for default
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Girish K S
girish.shivananja...@linaro.org wrote:
This patch adds the power off notification handling
during suspend and system poweroff.
For suspend mode short timeout is used, whereas for the
normal poweroff long timeout is used.
Signed-off-by: Girish K S
Hi Girish,
I think it's still incomplete, does power off short function is called
at suspend properly?
there are some comments below.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Girish K S
girish.shivananja...@linaro.org wrote:
This patch adds the handling of the poweroff notify
Please also consider it.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Girish K S
girish.shivananja...@linaro.org wrote:
This patch adds the support for power off notify feature
available in eMMC 4.5 devices.
If the the host has support for this feature, then the
mmc core
.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
This patch adds support handling of CPU ID and varialble silicon revision
at runtime.
[PATCH 1/4] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add support for detecting CPU at runtime
[PATCH 2/4] ARM: S5P64X0: Use
Interesting. there's no s5p_reset_hook at exynos4.
Anyway, after implement the s5p_reset_hook, it's working without
hacking of v7-fin.
Send it another mail.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Marek Szyprowski
m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
Hello,
On Friday, August 19
. Register chipid clk
2. Get the chipid clk
3. Read CHPIID,
4. Put tht chipid clk.
Then you can save some power.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
+
+ return subrev;
+}
+
int __init exynos4_init(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO EXYNOS4: Initializing architecture\n);
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat
Does it also need to provide the mdma?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:06 PM, alim akhtar alim.akh...@samsung.com wrote:
From: Alim Akhtar alim.akh...@samsung.com
Two instance of platform data is provided for PL330 but only one PL330 DMAC
instance is registered with amba_device.
These patch sets
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com wrote:
Hi,
Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com
wrote:
This patch add platform devices for Synopsys DesignWare Multimedia Card
Interface driver.
Signed-off
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com wrote:
This patch add platform devices for Synopsys DesignWare Multimedia Card
Interface driver.
Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig | 12
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
From: Jongpill Lee boyko@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Jongpill Lee boyko@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: SangWook Ju sw...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi jhbird.c...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
It's first step to handle the EVT.
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
From a24392183d396fab790557b0efb35e840c9e8a81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:38:25 +0100
Subject
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:03 PM, p.pan...@samsung.com wrote:
From: Praveen Paneri p.pan...@samsung.com
A generic method to initialize and exit OTG PHY which can be
used for all the samsung SoCs.
OTG platdata structure added in platform to pass required
platform specific functions and data
Hi,
There are some boards which use the EVT0 chip. some SMDKV310 and
Universal-C210.
With this changes, it can't use these boards.
Do you want to remove EVT0 based boards?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com wrote:
This patch adds
2011/6/10 Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com:
On 06/07/11 15:36, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
I see no effort from the Samsung folk to even start considering moving
to common APIs - I see precisely the opposite. They seem to have a
strong desire to invent their own new APIs all the time
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Angus Ainslie angus.ains...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:54 AM, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 17:39 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011
CCed Display developers from other Samsung open source team
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki snj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Anand,
On 06/10/2011 10:15 AM, Anand Kumar N wrote:
This patch series is based on the latest
with mismatch prefix.
So how about to clean up the mismatch prefix, S3C_* and S5P_* at this time?
One method is that it just passes the physical address and driver
should ioremap at driver instead of static mapping.
How do you think?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham thomas
the generic DMA APIs, it's also need to modify the its
consumer, sound and SPI.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
and s3c_gpio_getpull_updown functions.
Personally I like to use the variable instead of function hooking.
set the correct variable at cpu dection and use it
then these thing make a single generic function and each gpio_cfg use
the same thing.
Anyway it's next step. current fix the bug first.
Acked-by: Kyungmin
.
Is there such a way to identify the SoC revision?
It's also required for OneNAND. as you know C210 EVT0 OneNAND DMA has
bug and need to workaround.
platform codes should provide the these function. please see the OMAP
codes. how to handle it.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
From
Hi,
I think you already saw the same patchs[1] at mailing list and even
worse you commented it[2]
One different is kconfig handling. and these can be handled easily as you did.
Please respect others works.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
1. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1385739
)
+
+#endif
Looks good to me.
One nitpick
How about to just create the one clkdev.h at plat-samsung with proper
ifdef endif config.
I think don't need to create clkdev.h for each SoCs.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/time.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/time.c
index 86b9fa0
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
On 05/27/11 18:53, Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Thomas Abrahamthomas...@samsung.com
wrote:
Add clkdev support for Samsung's Exynos4 platform and fixes the
incorrect clock name
,
Kyungmin Park
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Linus,
Please pull Samsung fixes from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
s5p-fixes-for-linus
These things are small fixes for 2.6.39-rc4.
If any problems, please let me
the
generic IRQ base instead of odd +32 magic)
- generic IOMMU consolidation.
BTW, who works on this at LSI?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
;
+ tmpdev.dev.init_name = s3c24xx-pwm.2;
what's this? why does it need at here?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
tin2 = clk_get(tmpdev.dev, pwm-tin);
if (IS_ERR(tin2))
panic(failed to get pwm-tin2 clock for system timer);
@@ -272,6 +273,7 @@ static void __init
));
+ }
+
+ if (cpuidle_register_device(device)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR CPUidle register device
failed\n,);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+device_initcall(exynos4_init_cpuidle);
--
1.7.1
Cc'ed Kyungmin Park.
Hmm...I'm thinking that we need
.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
Anyway, I think Marek's initial idea is good esp., clock handling.
But now, this looks better for its enhancement and as we know if required,
we can improve this later.
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com, Senior Engineer,
SW
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski t.stanisl...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/clock.c | 6 +++
arch/arm/mach
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Hi all,
As I know, S5P-TV(HDMI) stuff needs more discussion.
I don't want to just merge platform devices which is not used anywhere.
Besides, there are two schemes for it in mailing list now.
It's different one, which
compile the exynos4 when turn on PM.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Linus,
Please pull Samsung fixes from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
s5p-fixes-for-linus
These things
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:27 PM, ALIM AKHTAR alim.akh...@samsung.com wrote:
This patch is based on 'for-next' branch of kgene tree.
This patch adds Samsung ARMLEX4210 board support file
which is based on Exynos4210.
Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar alim.akh...@samsung.com
---
you,
Kyungmin Park
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Marek Szyprowski
m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote:
Most suspend/resume code depends on CONFIG_PM. This causes problems
if one wants to enable Runtime PM (to control power domains for example),
but doesn't need system suspend/resume feature
-time.o
Do you test it with exynos4 configuration? it's affect the exynos compile.
First select SAMSUNG_DEV_PWM, it can't compile it since no init_sched_clock
Second select HAVE_SCHED_CLOCK, it can't boot.
I used the for-exynos4 branch.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
# devices
diff --git a/arch
frequent mistake.
At each mach/gpio.h
#ifndef __LINUX_GPIO_H
#error You should include linux/gpio.h instead of mach/gpio.h.
#endif
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc
in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Kyungmin Park wrote:
Hi,
MCT is only possible from EVT1.0 or later. The current universal_c210
used the EVT0 version.
So can you remove the ifdef and board can select which timer is used?
Please refer the omap
at
universal_c210 board.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
From: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com
The Multi-Core Timer(MCT) of EXYNOS4 is designed for implementing
clock source timer and clock event timers. This patch implements
1 clock
Hi,
At that time Russell modified the s5cv310, tegra, and realview also. I
think you also modify it.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
This patch fixes wrong constants in the hotplug assembly code for
Exynos4 such as Russell's
-exynos4. do you handle all exynos4 series
at this mach directory?
historically there's no rules of the base RAM address at least samsung chips.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
This patch set changes to ARCH_EXYNOS4 from ARCH_S5PV310
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Sangbeom Kim sbki...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi,
I answer your questions in detail.
On Monday, February 14, 2011 8:16 PM, Kyungmin Park wrote:
Hi,
Wow, fast move, but need to more explanation.
what's the exact meaning of exynos4210?
Exynos4 is prefix
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Add regulator supplies required for NOON010PC30 CIF sensor.
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki s.nawro...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach
Hi Chris,
Unfortunately it's not merged your tree.
It's required for s5pc210 board. can you merge it for 37-rc6 or later?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
From: Jeongbae Seo jeongbae@samsung.com
This patch adds to support
0x18c
#define S5P_CIDMAPARAM_R_LINEAR (0 29)
--
1.6.2.5
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/include/mach/irqs.h | 3 +++
arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/include/mach/map.h | 5 +
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/include/mach/irqs.h b/arch/arm
-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig | 10
arch/arm/plat-s5p/Makefile | 2 +
arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-csis0.c | 34
+
arch/arm/plat-s5p/dev-csis1.c | 33
Hi,
It's same patch early.
I used the email address by ./script/get_maintainer.sh
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/953c417a31756ab9?pli=1
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
According to struct
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
From: Seungwhan Youn sw.y...@samsung.com
This patch adds to enable/disable DMA operation clock on S3C-PL330
DMA
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Sangbeom Kim wrote:
From: Jongpill Lee boyko@samsung.com
This patch adds initial map for GPIO2 and GPIO3.
S5PV310/S5PC210 has separated GPIO1, GPIO2 and GPIO3.
Signed-off-by: Jongpill Lee boyko@samsung.com
Hi Chris,
we make a conclusion use this patch. Can you merge it for 2.6.37?
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
From: Jeongbae Seo jeongbae@samsung.com
This patch adds to support no internal clock
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
From: Jeongbae Seo jeongbae@samsung.com
This patch adds to support no internal clock divider in SDHCI.
The external clock divider can be used to make a proper clock
because SDHCI doesn't support internal clock divider
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Kyungmin Park wrote:
From: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
S5PC210 has PL310 1MiB L2 cache.
It uses the optimized data tag latency and also enable the prefetch.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p
Hi,
I agree your approach, put the common features in common place.
but Samsung maintainers insist put these at each machine file at current time.
So move this to the each machines for their tastes.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Maurus Cuelenaere mcuelena
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Maurus Cuelenaere mcuelena...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 06-10-10 01:23, Kyungmin Park schreef:
Hi,
I agree your approach, put the common features in common place.
but Samsung maintainers insist put these at each machine file at current
time.
So move
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:40:02PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
FYI: now wm8994 codec is connected to I/O power directly. and there's
no connection with PMIC.
Presumably there's a power rail connection
.
There's lots of codes use PULL_UP as default pin setup.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
break;
case 1:
- s3c_gpio_cfgpin(S5P6440_GPC(4), S3C_GPIO_SFN(2));
- s3c_gpio_cfgpin(S5P6440_GPC(5), S3C_GPIO_SFN(2));
- s3c_gpio_cfgpin(S5P6440_GPC
it
at each configuration as is.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
- .base = S5PC100_GPA0_BASE,
- .config = gpio_cfg,
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
This patch clean up the GPIO code and removes useless GPIO addresses.
It can be calculated
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Jeongbae Seo jeongbae@samsung.com wrote:
Chris wrote:
Hi Kyungmin, Ben,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:18:12AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:08:28PM
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:08:28PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
Well there are two implementations. and no conclusion yet.
as s5pc210 don't support internal SDHCI clock, DMC overrides the
function operation itself when
it's text type.
Hi,
Thank you for your interesting.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Kyungmin Park kmp...@infradead.org wrote:
(snip)
+#define TORBRECK_UFCON_DEFAULT (S3C2410_UFCON_FIFOMODE | \
+ S5PV210_UFCON_TXTRIG4
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Kukjin Kim wrote:
Kyungmin Park wrote:
Do you check the DVS feature?
It can support the DVS by GPIOs and platform can set the each voltages
at
each mode.
Ok...I agree about the feature's necessity that you said
.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim jy0922.s...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig |5 +
arch/arm/plat-s5p/Makefile |1 +
arch
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:10 PM, 최규호 chlrb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your interesting.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Kyungmin Park kmp...@infradead.org
wrote:
Hi,
Looks good to me except minor fixup.
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
On Sun, Sep 26
from me.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
Andrew, I've been waiting for an ACK from Ben Dooks, since he's listed
in MAINTAINERS for this driver, but he hasn't replied yet (I've tried
pinging privately). I'll plan on sending Marek's two s3c fixes to
Linus tomorrow regardless (this one with Cc: sta
Hi,
Well there are two implementations. and no conclusion yet.
as s5pc210 don't support internal SDHCI clock, DMC overrides the
function operation itself when s5pc210. System LSI use the quirks.
Choose any one from MMC maintainer.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:37 PM
you,
Kyungmin Park
+
+endmenu
+
endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/Makefile
index aefb14f..c89b6b0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/Makefile
@@ -29,3 +29,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210) +=
mach
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Jeongbae Seo jeongbae@samsung.com
wrote:
From: Hyuk Lee hyuk1@samsung.com
This patch adds to support HSMMC for S5PV310 and S5PC210 and setup for
HSMMC
2010/9/17 Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com:
Kyungmin Park wrote:
First thank you for posting the patches.
but I'm worry about sending the same feature patches from different
divisions.
It doesn't matter which division it is from.
What matters is the quality of the patch.
Any patches can
2010/9/17 Sangbeom Kim sbki...@samsung.com:
Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Sangbeom Kim sbki...@samsung.com wrote:
From: Jongpill Lee boyko@samsung.com
This patch adds suspend-to-ram support for S5PV210.
Note. This patch is confirmed on SMDKV210 and SMDKC110
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Sangbeom Kim sbki...@samsung.com wrote:
From: Jongpill Lee boyko@samsung.com
This patch adds suspend-to-ram support for S5PV210.
Note. This patch is confirmed on SMDKV210 and SMDKC110 board.
Signed-off-by: Jongpill Lee boyko@samsung.com
-samsung/shortlog/refs/heads/cpufreq
To kgene,
One code from DMC(me), another code from System LSI(you). then which
codes do you pick up and apply to mainline?
and what's rules or principles?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jaecheol Lee jc@samsung.com wrote:
This patch
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Kyungmin Park wrote:
From: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
S5PC210 has PL310 1MiB L2 cache.
It uses the optimized data tag latency and also enable the prefetch.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p
board.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Add the necessary definitions and mapping information to enable the
s3c-hsotg gadget to build.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com
Signed-off
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
From: Changhwan Youn chaos.y...@samsung.com
This patch changes RTC initialization method on probe() as
per Wan ZongShun's suggestion. The 'rtc_valid_tm(tm)' can
check whether RTC BCD is valid or not.
And should be
Do you check the DVS feature?
It can support the DVS by GPIOs and platform can set the each voltages at
each mode.
As quick review of max8649. It can't support it.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
-Original Message-
From: Kukjin Kim [mailto:kgene@samsung.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08
For long time you insist to use the S5P prefix, but it's changed to
each SoC name.
anyway good move.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
This patch moves some initial maps from plat-s5p to machine,
so that can merge mach-s5p6440 and mach-s5p6450.
support
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SMDK6440) += mach-smdk6440.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SMDK6450) += mach-smdk6450.o
Are there difference between smdk6440 and smdk6450 except the SOC?
If no, how about to make a single file as pxa or omap does?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
+
+# device support
+
+obj-y
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
This patch moves smdk6440 board file from mach-s5p6440 into the new
mach-s5p64x0 directory and adds smdk6450 board file.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
---
.../{mach-s5p6440 =
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:15:36AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Seems almost same between the operation of max8649 and max8952 except
output
voltage range.
How do you think that can support max8952
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:15:36AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Seems almost same between the operation
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Kyungmin Park wrote:
NAK.
I don't know why I need your ack for this...if any opinions, just comments
is enough.
Okay I said in other word, I can't agree this patch.
This approach don't make a common GPIO framework
?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel.
[0.00] Linux version 2.6.36-rc1-ga400ca7-dirty
(dofm...@dofmind-linux) (gcc version 4.4.1 (GCC) ) #334 PREEMPT Mon
Aug 23 10:45:59 KST 2010
[0.00] CPU: ARMv7 Processor [412fc091] revision 1 (ARMv7), cr
101 - 200 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
