On 四, 2012-08-16 at 17:11 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patchset introduces a new generic cooling device based on cpufreq
> that can be used on non-ACPI platforms. As a proof of concept, we have
> drivers for the following platforms using this mechanism now:
>
> * Samsung Exynos (Exyn
On 五, 2012-08-17 at 11:56 +0300, Valentin, Eduardo wrote:
> Hello,
> >>> +
> >>> +
> >>> +1.2 CPU cooling action notifier register/unregister interface
> >>> +1.2.1 int cputherm_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> >>> + unsigned int list)
> >>> +
> >>> +This interface registers
ipping frequency .
The drivers can also register to recieve notification about any cooling
action called.
Cc: Guenter Roeck
Cc: SangWook Ju
Cc: Durgadoss
Cc: Len Brown
Cc: Jean Delvare
Cc: Kyungmin Park
Cc: Kukjin Kim
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-b
On 一, 2012-09-10 at 09:50 +0300, Valentin, Eduardo wrote:
> Hello Rui and Amit,
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > Refreshed to remove the notifier mechanism as we do not have a real user of
> > it.
> > if there is no problem, I'll appl
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:56 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This modification adds 2 new thermal trend type THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL
> and THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL. This thermal trend can be used to quickly
> jump to the upper or lower cooling level instead of incremental increase
> or decrease.
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 11:56 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> On 8 November 2012 11:31, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:56 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> >> This modification adds 2 new thermal trend type THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL
> >> and THERMAL_TREND_DR
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:51 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> On 9 November 2012 09:21, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 11:56 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> >> On 8 November 2012 11:31, Zhang Rui wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:56 +0530, Amit Dani
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 22:55 -0700, R, Durgadoss wrote:
> Hi Amit/Rui,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Amit Kachhap [mailto:amit.kach...@linaro.org]
> > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 11:52 AM
> > To: Zhang, Rui
> > Cc: linux...@lists.linux-
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 12:31 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> On 15 November 2012 12:09, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> > CPU_FREQ_TABLE depends on CPU_FREQ. Selecting CPU_FREQ_TABLE without
> > checking
> > for dependencies gives the following compilation warnings:
> > warning: (ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC && ARCH_TEGR
] On Behalf Of Amit Daniel Kachhap
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 12:26 PM
> To: linux...@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; R,
> Durgadoss; l...@kernel.org; Zhang, Rui; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org;
> amit.kach...@linaro.
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 10:11 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> On 22 November 2012 06:52, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:56 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> >> This modification adds 2 new thermal trend type THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL
> >> and THERMAL_TREND_DR
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:56 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This modification adds 2 new thermal trend type THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL
> and THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL. This thermal trend can be used to quickly
> jump to the upper or lower cooling level instead of incremental increase
> or decrease.
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 09:35 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> On 22 November 2012 13:42, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 10:11 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> >> On 22 November 2012 06:52, Zhang Rui wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:56 +0530, Amit Dani
Hi, Amit,
On 三, 2012-04-04 at 10:02 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> Hi Len/Rui,
>
> Any comment or feedback from your side about the status of this patch?
> Is it merge-able or major re-work is needed? I have fixed most of the
> comments in this patchset and currently working on some of the minor
>
On 三, 2012-04-11 at 18:17 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> Hi Rui,
>
> Thanks for looking into the patches.
>
> On 10 April 2012 06:28, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > Hi, Amit,
> >
> > On 三, 2012-04-04 at 10:02 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> >> Hi Len/Rui,
> >>
, May 08, 2012 9:18 AM
To: a...@linux-foundation.org; linux...@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: R, Durgadoss; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; l...@kernel.org; Zhang, Rui;
amit.kach...@linaro.org; linaro-...@lists.linaro.org;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
linux-samsung-soc
Hi, Amit,
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 16:08 -0800, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patch adds support to set the emulated temperature method in
> thermal zone (sensor). After setting this feature thermal zone must
> report this temperature and not the actual temperature. The actual
> implementation of
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 11:30 -0800, amit kachhap wrote:
> Hi Rui,
>
> Thanks for the review comments,
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > Hi, Amit,
> >
> > On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 16:08 -0800, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> >> This
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 19:28 -0800, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patch adds support to set the emulated temperature method in
> thermal zone (sensor). After setting this feature thermal zone may
> report this temperature and not the actual temperature. The emulation
> implementation may be base
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 19:28 -0800, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This removes the driver specific sysfs support of the temperature
> emulation and uses the newly added core thermal framework for thermal
> emulation. A platform specific handler is added to support this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Danie
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 16:30 -0800, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patch adds support to set the emulated temperature method in
> thermal zone (sensor). After setting this feature thermal zone may
> report this temperature and not the actual temperature. The emulation
> implementation may be base
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 10:14 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 19:28 -0800, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> > This removes the driver specific sysfs support of the temperature
> > emulation and uses the newly added core thermal framework for thermal
> > emulation
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 17:13 -0800, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> From: Jonghwa Lee
>
> This patch introduces using temperature falling interrupt in exynos
> thermal driver. Former patch, it only use polling way to check
> whether if system themperature is fallen. However, exynos SOC also
> provide
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 17:13 -0800, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patch uses the quick thermal cooling trend type macros. This is needed
> as exynos5 and other thermal sensors now supports only interrupt method for
> thresold temperature check.
>
> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim
> Signed-off-by: Amit Da
Hi, Andrew,
can you please verify
commit fc35b35cbe24ef021ea9acfba21e54da958df747
commit 57df8106932b57427df1eaaa13871857f75b1194
at
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git/log/?h=thermal
fixes the problem for you?
thanks,
rui
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 14:59 -0700, Andrew
by only the exynos platform. Fortunately a number
> > of drivers that include those headers do not actually need
> > them, so we can just remove the inclusions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
> > Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Zhang Rui
>
> This patc
Hi, all,
what is the status now?
which one is preferred, this one or the one from Amit's patch set?
thanks,
rui
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 18:29 +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
>
> > Amit, Lukasz,
> >
> > On 25-04-2013 09:29, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > Hi Amit,
> > >
> > >> Hi Luka
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 16:07 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This movement of files is done for easy maintenance and adding more
> new sensor's support for exynos platform easily . This will also help in
> bifurcating exynos common, sensor driver and sensor data related parts.
>
> Acked-by: Kuk
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 16:07 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This code bifurcates exynos thermal implementation into common and sensor
> specific parts. The common thermal code interacts with core thermal layer and
> core cpufreq cooling parts and is independent of SOC specific driver. This
> ch
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 16:07 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patch renames exynos_thermal.c to exynos_tmu.c. This change is needed as
> this file now just contains exynos tmu driver related codes and thermal zone
> or cpufreq cooling registration related changes are not there anymore.
>
>
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 16:07 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patch renames and moves include/linux/platform_data/exynos_thermal.h to
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h. This file movement is needed as exynos
> SOC's are not supporting non-DT based platforms. Also the rename is needed a
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 16:07 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This code splits the exynos tmu driver code into SOC specific data parts.
> This will simplify adding new SOC specific data to the same TMU controller.
>
> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap
I'm okay with all
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 18:30 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This code bifurcates exynos thermal implementation into common and sensor
> specific parts. The common thermal code interacts with core thermal layer and
> core cpufreq cooling parts and is independent of SOC specific driver. This
> ch
3 1:47 PM
> To: Zhang, Rui; Eduardo Valentin; kgene@samsung.com
> Cc: Lukasz Majewski; Linux PM list; Lukasz Majewski; linux-kernel;
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; Amit Daniel
> Kachhap; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] the
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 23:47 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> Set the return variable to an error code as done elsewhere in the function.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> //
> (
> if@p1 (\
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 17:42 +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> This patch fixes a compilation warning.
>
> warning: passing argument 5 of 'thermal_zone_device_register' discards 'const'
> qualifier from pointer target type [enabled by default]
> include/linux/thermal.h:270:29: note: expected
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 11:35 +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> This patch replaces the inten_rise_shift/mask and inten_fall_shift/mask
> with intclr_rise_shift/mask and intclr_fall_shift/mask respectively.
> Currently, inten_rise_shift/mask and inten_fall_shift/mask bits are only used
> to co
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 18:12 +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> On Exynos5420 the TMU(4) for GPU has a seperate clock enable bit from
> the other TMU channels(0 ~ 3). Hence, accessing TRIMINFO for base_second
> should be acompanied by enabling the respective clock.
>
> This patch which allow
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 01:35 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 07, 2014 07:58:24 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
>
> Hi,
>
> > > This patch series introduces support for CPU overclocking technique
> > > called Boost.
> > >
> > > It is a follow up of a LAB governor pro
W managed shut down of the system.
> If the last trip point is crossed, the PMU HW generates the power off
> signal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski
> Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham
> Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui
thanks,
rui
>
> ---
> Changes for
On 四, 2014-04-24 at 11:48 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> On 4/14/14, Tushar Behera wrote:
> > Currently the threshold limits are updated in 2 stages, once for all
> > software trigger levels and again for hardware trip point.
> I guess the first stage is bootloader as could not find this in this fil
On 一, 2014-05-05 at 13:15 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series contains various cleanups for EXYNOS thermal
> driver. Overall it decreases driver's LOC by 13%. It is based
> on next-20140428 kernel. It should not cause any functionality
> changes.
>
Amit,
what d
Eduardo,
what do you think of this patch set?
thanks,
rui
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 19:27 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series contains various cleanups for EXYNOS thermal
> driver. Overall it decreases driver's LOC by 12%. It is based
> on next-20140617 kernel. It
As the original patch has not been in upstream, I'd prefer a refreshed patch,
rather than an incremental fix.
Thanks,
rui
> -Original Message-
> From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:s.ha...@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:38 PM
> To: Zhang, Rui
> Cc:
> -Original Message-
> From: Punit Agrawal [mailto:punit.agra...@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 6:52 PM
> To: Sascha Hauer
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Rui; Eduardo Valentin; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; Jean Delvare; Peter Feuerer; Heiko
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 09:00 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch adds the registers, bit fields and compatible strings
> required to support for the 1 TMU channels on Exynos3250.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi
> [Add MUX address setting bits by Jonghwa Lee]
> Signed-off-by: Jonghwa Lee
> Ack
> -Original Message-
> From: amit.kach...@gmail.com [mailto:amit.kach...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of amit daniel kachhap
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 1:20 PM
> To: Zhang, Rui
> Cc: Eduardo Valentin; Kukjin Kim; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> samsung-...@vger.
On 三, 2013-08-07 at 14:01 +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> The error check is checking for a "base" mapped memory base
> instead of "base_common". Fixing the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
applied. Thanks!
BTW, can you rebase the other three exynos patches you submitte
On 二, 2013-08-27 at 23:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 02:26:41 PM Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > On 23-08-2013 19:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, August 23, 2013 06:03:14 PM Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > >> When registering a new thermal_device, the therma
49 matches
Mail list logo
