On 5 March 2014 17:42, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 05.03.2014 09:25, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>
>> On 25 February 2014 17:12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 25 February 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
I disagree. I don't know what Samsung has in mind, but the revision of
the CPU doesn
On 05.03.2014 09:25, Sachin Kamat wrote:
On 25 February 2014 17:12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 25 February 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
I disagree. I don't know what Samsung has in mind, but the revision of
the CPU doesn't have all that much to do with the rest of the SoC.
It's quite likel
On 25 February 2014 17:12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 February 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> I disagree. I don't know what Samsung has in mind, but the revision of
>> the CPU doesn't have all that much to do with the rest of the SoC.
>> It's quite likely that some vendors (maybe not Sam
On Tuesday 25 February 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
> I disagree. I don't know what Samsung has in mind, but the revision of
> the CPU doesn't have all that much to do with the rest of the SoC.
> It's quite likely that some vendors (maybe not Samsung, but the same
> concept applies) will ship 64-bit
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> On 25 February 2014 06:22, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On 25.02.2014 01:35, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/24/14 21:03, Sachin Kamat wrote:
On 21 February 2014 21:01, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> On 21.02.2014 16:21, Tomasz Figa wrote
On 25 February 2014 06:22, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 25.02.2014 01:35, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>
>> On 02/24/14 21:03, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 February 2014 21:01, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 21.02.2014 16:21, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
>
> On 21.02.2014 15:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
On 02/25/14 09:52, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 25.02.2014 01:35, Kukjin Kim wrote:
[...]
Well, let me see common.c and mach-exynos.c, one is for SoC specific
stuff and the other is for Board specific so I think, keeping current
file would be good, we can change the file name mach-exynos.c or
board-
On 25.02.2014 01:35, Kukjin Kim wrote:
On 02/24/14 21:03, Sachin Kamat wrote:
On 21 February 2014 21:01, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 21.02.2014 16:21, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 21.02.2014 15:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 21 February 2014 14:18:49 Tomasz Figa wrote:
Now that we have a broade
On 02/24/14 21:03, Sachin Kamat wrote:
On 21 February 2014 21:01, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 21.02.2014 16:21, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 21.02.2014 15:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 21 February 2014 14:18:49 Tomasz Figa wrote:
Now that we have a broader agreement on this, I think we can go
a
On 21 February 2014 21:01, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 21.02.2014 16:21, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> On 21.02.2014 15:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>> On Friday 21 February 2014 14:18:49 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Now that we have a broader agreement on this, I think we can go
> ahead with th
On 21 February 2014 20:51, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 21.02.2014 15:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> On Friday 21 February 2014 14:18:49 Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>
>>>
Now that we have a broader agreement on this, I think we can go ahead
with the
following steps as an initial approach:
On 21.02.2014 16:21, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 21.02.2014 15:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 21 February 2014 14:18:49 Tomasz Figa wrote:
Now that we have a broader agreement on this, I think we can go
ahead with the
following steps as an initial approach:
1. Have a common machine file for bot
On 21.02.2014 15:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 21 February 2014 14:18:49 Tomasz Figa wrote:
Now that we have a broader agreement on this, I think we can go ahead with the
following steps as an initial approach:
1. Have a common machine file for both exynos4 and 5 files, mach-exynos-dt.c.
On Friday 21 February 2014 14:18:49 Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> > Now that we have a broader agreement on this, I think we can go ahead with
> > the
> > following steps as an initial approach:
> > 1. Have a common machine file for both exynos4 and 5 files,
> > mach-exynos-dt.c.
> > 2. Introduce a gen
On 21.02.2014 07:08, Sachin Kamat wrote:
On 20 February 2014 23:18, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 20 February 2014 18:34:23 Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 20.02.2014 18:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Of course nothing stops you from retaining more specific compatible
strings. In fact, this is probably th
On 20 February 2014 23:18, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 20 February 2014 18:34:23 Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On 20.02.2014 18:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> >> Of course nothing stops you from retaining more specific compatible
>> >> strings. In fact, this is probably the most appropriate solution,
On Thursday 20 February 2014 18:34:23 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 20.02.2014 18:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> Of course nothing stops you from retaining more specific compatible
> >> strings. In fact, this is probably the most appropriate solution,
> >> because in future you might find out that certain
On 20.02.2014 18:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 20 February 2014, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 20.02.2014 05:14, Sachin Kamat wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
On 19 February 2014 18:15, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Sachin,
[adding linux-arm-kernel ML to CC list]
On 19.02.2014 12:34, Sachin Kamat wrote:
To avo
On Thursday 20 February 2014, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 20.02.2014 05:14, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> >
> > On 19 February 2014 18:15, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >> Hi Sachin,
> >>
> >> [adding linux-arm-kernel ML to CC list]
> >>
> >>
> >> On 19.02.2014 12:34, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> >>>
> >>> To
[adding DT ML and DT maintainers on Cc for some discussion]
On 20.02.2014 05:14, Sachin Kamat wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
On 19 February 2014 18:15, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Sachin,
[adding linux-arm-kernel ML to CC list]
On 19.02.2014 12:34, Sachin Kamat wrote:
To avoid modifying the kernel every ti
Hi Tomasz,
On 19 February 2014 18:15, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Sachin,
>
> [adding linux-arm-kernel ML to CC list]
>
>
> On 19.02.2014 12:34, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>
>> To avoid modifying the kernel every time a new SoC variant
>> comes out.
>
> Since all Exynos chips can be easily recognized usin
Hi Sachin,
[adding linux-arm-kernel ML to CC list]
On 19.02.2014 12:34, Sachin Kamat wrote:
To avoid modifying the kernel every time a new SoC variant
comes out.
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos4-dt.c |1 +
arch/arm/mach-exyn
To avoid modifying the kernel every time a new SoC variant
comes out.
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos4-dt.c |1 +
arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c |1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos
23 matches
Mail list logo
