Re: [PATCH 02/15] be2iscsi: Fix mbox synchronization replacing spinlock with mutex

2015-12-19 Thread Mike Christie
On 12/20/2015 01:35 AM, Mike Christie wrote: > On 12/15/2015 09:54 AM, Jitendra Bhivare wrote: >> From: Jitendra >> >> This is second part of actual fix for soft lockup. >> >> All mbox cmds issued using BMBX and MCC are synchronized using mutex >> mbox_lock instead

Re: [PATCH 02/15] be2iscsi: Fix mbox synchronization replacing spinlock with mutex

2015-12-19 Thread Mike Christie
On 12/15/2015 09:54 AM, Jitendra Bhivare wrote: > From: Jitendra > > This is second part of actual fix for soft lockup. > > All mbox cmds issued using BMBX and MCC are synchronized using mutex > mbox_lock instead of spin_lock. Used mutex_lock_interruptible where

Re: [PATCH 02/15] be2iscsi: Fix mbox synchronization replacing spinlock with mutex

2015-12-18 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 12/15/2015 04:54 PM, Jitendra Bhivare wrote: From: Jitendra This is second part of actual fix for soft lockup. All mbox cmds issued using BMBX and MCC are synchronized using mutex mbox_lock instead of spin_lock. Used mutex_lock_interruptible where ever

[PATCH 02/15] be2iscsi: Fix mbox synchronization replacing spinlock with mutex

2015-12-15 Thread Jitendra Bhivare
From: Jitendra This is second part of actual fix for soft lockup. All mbox cmds issued using BMBX and MCC are synchronized using mutex mbox_lock instead of spin_lock. Used mutex_lock_interruptible where ever possible. Signed-off-by: Jitendra