On 12/20/2015 01:35 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 09:54 AM, Jitendra Bhivare wrote:
>> From: Jitendra
>>
>> This is second part of actual fix for soft lockup.
>>
>> All mbox cmds issued using BMBX and MCC are synchronized using mutex
>> mbox_lock instead
On 12/15/2015 09:54 AM, Jitendra Bhivare wrote:
> From: Jitendra
>
> This is second part of actual fix for soft lockup.
>
> All mbox cmds issued using BMBX and MCC are synchronized using mutex
> mbox_lock instead of spin_lock. Used mutex_lock_interruptible where
On 12/15/2015 04:54 PM, Jitendra Bhivare wrote:
From: Jitendra
This is second part of actual fix for soft lockup.
All mbox cmds issued using BMBX and MCC are synchronized using mutex
mbox_lock instead of spin_lock. Used mutex_lock_interruptible where
ever
From: Jitendra
This is second part of actual fix for soft lockup.
All mbox cmds issued using BMBX and MCC are synchronized using mutex
mbox_lock instead of spin_lock. Used mutex_lock_interruptible where
ever possible.
Signed-off-by: Jitendra
4 matches
Mail list logo