Re: Re: How to disable NCQ with mpt3sas ?

2019-02-24 Thread Suganath Prabu Subramani
Hi Vaughan, NCQ feature is only for SATA. Enabling / Disabling NCQ through mpt3sas/lsiutil support is only for SATA drives. Thanks, Suganath On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:12 AM ca...@uit.com.cn wrote: > > Hi Suganath, > >[448435.392210] scsi 4:0:0:0: atapi(n), ncq(n), asyn_notify(n),smart(y),

RE: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM / devfreq: Actually support providing freq_table

2018-04-23 Thread MyungJoo Ham
>On Mon 23 Apr 19:48 PDT 2018, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 2018??? 04??? 24??? 09:20, Bjorn Andersson wrote: >> > The code in devfreq_add_device() handles the case where a freq_table is >> > passed by the client, but then requests min and max frequences from >> > the, in this case absent

RE RE

2016-09-24 Thread Mr.Campbell Neiman
This message is the last notification about U USD14.5 million bearing our Name as Beneficiary, all effort to reach you have not be successful, Please if you Receive this message kindly respond back stating your Desire to make the claim, Reconfirm your full name and age Mr. Mr.Campbell Neiman -- To

Re: Re [PATCH RFC]: LIO seems to use SCSI Allocation Length instead of SPDTL for calculating ResidualCount

2016-07-20 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
Hi Sumit, Apologies for the delayed response. Comments below.. On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 19:24 +0530, Sumit Rai wrote: > > From: Sumit Rai > > Subject: LIO seems to use SCSI Allocation Length instead of SPDTL for > > calculating ResidualCount > > Date: June 22, 2016 at 7:43:50 PM GMT+5:30 > > To:

RE: RE

2016-03-19 Thread Robert
Please confirm receipt of my previous mail..When can i call you -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Re: twa generates WARNING upon boot

2015-09-30 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Christoph, [auto build test results on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore] config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config) reproduce: git checkout 6e392493504e88ec3b44596c22f08acf4eed11ee # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All error/w

Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/10] scsi/trace: Use scsi_show_result trace point instead of printk

2014-09-02 Thread Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
Hi Christoph, Sorry for the late reply. (2014/08/29 9:50), Christoph Hellwig wrote: I'm not sure this is the correct way. Currently we have quite some code duplication in scsi_trace.c and constants.c, correct. So I definitely would like to see them both merged. But constants.c is influenced by

Re: Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi/trace: Use macros for getting driver byte, host byte, msg byte, and status byte

2014-09-01 Thread Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
(2014/09/02 0:15), Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 12:33:28PM +, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote: For getting driver byte, host byte, msg byte, and status byte, macros are implemented in scsi/scsi.h, so we use it. As mentioned about three times in various previous scsi logging dis

Re: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/10] scsi/trace: Use scsi_print_command trace point instead of printk

2014-08-27 Thread Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
Hi Hannes, I tried to remove duplicated decoder of SCSI command, but the output format of it in constants.c is different from it in traceevents. I have two questions for it. (Ex1) traceevents: TEST_UNIT_READY constants: Test Unit Ready => Which of "XXX_YYY_ZZZ" and "Xxx Yyy Zzz" should the kern

Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/10] scsi/trace: Use scsi_print_command trace point instead of printk

2014-08-27 Thread Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
(2014/08/27 23:16), Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 08/08/2014 01:50 PM, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote: Previous printk messages of SCSI command can be mixed into other printk messages because multiple printk messages are output for it. To avoid the problem, patch 4e64bb8d6 in Hannes' branch(*1) introduced

Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/10] scsi/trace: Add additional sense code and additional sense code qualifier to scsi_print_sense trace point

2014-08-27 Thread Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
(2014/08/27 23:16), Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 08/08/2014 01:50 PM, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote: There are no mean that additional sense code and additional sense code qualifier are output as different messages of sense key, so those information are added. Note: scsi_show_extd_sense() is changed fro

Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/10] scsi/trace: Use scsi_print_sense trace point instead of printk

2014-08-27 Thread Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
(2014/08/27 23:15), Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 08/08/2014 01:50 PM, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote: Previous sense messages can be mixed into other sense messages, because continuous printk (KERN_CONT) was used. To avoid the problem, patch d87f3a6f51 introduced a local buffer in Hannes's baranch (*1). B

Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/10] scsi/trace: Use scsi_show_result trace point instead of printk

2014-08-27 Thread Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
(2014/08/27 23:12), Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 08/08/2014 01:50 PM, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote: Current SCSI trace has hostbyte table and driverbyte table, so we don't need to have the same table in scsi/constants.c. - Result examples (printk) sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=

Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/10] scsi/constants: Cleanup printk message in scsi_dump_sense_buffer()

2014-08-17 Thread Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
(2014/08/16 0:08), Ewan Milne wrote: On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 11:50 +, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote: Unrecognized sense data should be output after linebuf is filled because "[%s] Unrecognized sense data (in hex): %s" message is output many times in loop. Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro YUNOMAE Cc: Hanne

Re: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 3/4] Introduce XEN scsiback module

2014-08-16 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 06:34 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 08/13/2014 09:02 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > > On 08/12/2014 11:13 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > >> Hi Juergen & Co, > >> > >> Finally had a chance to review this code. Comments are inline below.. > > >>> +static struct se_node_acl

Re: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 3/4] Introduce XEN scsiback module

2014-08-14 Thread Juergen Gross
Nicholas, just one more question (see below): On 08/12/2014 11:13 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: Hi Juergen & Co, Finally had a chance to review this code. Comments are inline below.. On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 09:49 +0200, jgr...@suse.com wrote: ... + if (IS_ERR(tv_nexus->tvn_se_sess

Re: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 3/4] Introduce XEN scsiback module

2014-08-13 Thread Juergen Gross
On 08/13/2014 09:02 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: On 08/12/2014 11:13 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: Hi Juergen & Co, Finally had a chance to review this code. Comments are inline below.. +static struct se_node_acl * +scsiback_alloc_fabric_acl(struct se_portal_group *se_tpg) +{ +struct scs

Re: Re: [RFC PATCH -logging 00/10] scsi/constants: Output continuous error messages on trace

2014-08-12 Thread Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
Hi Douglas, Thank you for your comment. (2014/08/08 22:07), Douglas Gilbert wrote: On 14-08-08 01:50 PM, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote: Hi All, This patch set introduces new traceevents in order to output continuous error messages. Current SCSI printk messages in upstream kernel can be divided by a

Re: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce XEN scsiback module

2014-07-11 Thread Juergen Gross
On 06/28/2014 08:09 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 04:34:35PM +0200, jgr...@suse.com wrote: From: Juergen Gross Introduces the XEN pvSCSI backend. With pvSCSI it is possible for a XEN domU to issue SCSI commands to a SCSI LUN assigned to that domU. The SCSI commands are p

Re: Re: [PATCH RESEND] scsi: Output error messages using structured printk in single line

2014-05-26 Thread Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
Hi Hannes, (2014/05/21 15:30), Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 05/21/2014 05:18 AM, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote: -Original Message- From: linux-scsi-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-scsi- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of James Bottomley Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 9:22 PM

Re: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: Add 'retry_timeout' to avoid infinite command retry

2014-02-10 Thread Eiichi Tsukata
(2014/02/07 15:15), Libo Chen wrote: On 2014/2/7 13:46, James Bottomley wrote: On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 09:22 +0900, Eiichi Tsukata wrote: Currently, scsi error handling in scsi_io_completion() tries to unconditionally requeue scsi command when device keeps some error state. For example, UNIT_ATT

Re: Re: scsi-mq + open-iscsi support patches..?

2013-11-27 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
Hi Jianpeng, (Trimming CC's) On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 10:46 +0800, kedacomkernel wrote: > Hi all, > I used target-pending/scsi-mq to test intel ahci,but it can't work.I > modify some places, now it can work.But still met hung task or oops. So after looking at your patches sent offlist, I don'

Re: Re: scsi-mq + open-iscsi support patches..?

2013-11-26 Thread kedacomkernel
Hi all, I used target-pending/scsi-mq to test intel ahci,but it can't work.I modify some places, now it can work.But still met hung task or oops. Who can receive my patch for that? Thanks! Jianpeng Ma >On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 16:10 +, Jayamohan Kallickal wrote: > > > >> >> On a related

Re: Re: [SCSI] mvsas: Fix the kernel panic due to unaligned data access

2013-06-18 Thread Paul Guo
Hi James, Thanks for the reply. See more below. > On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 15:01 +0800, Paul Guo wrote: >> It's easy to find the address and symbol that causes the unalignd data >> access according to the stack dump information. The following small >> patch will fix it. > > Do you have the panic lo

Re: Re: [PATCH] target: For iblock at default writecache enable.

2013-01-29 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
Hi majianpeng, On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 09:19 +0800, majianpeng wrote: > >On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 15:04 -0800, Andy Grover wrote: > >> On 01/29/2013 11:03 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > >> > >> > So enabling emulate_write_cache=1 in the case when the underlying device > >> > has not enabled it is

Re: Re: [PATCH] target: For iblock at default writecache enable.

2013-01-29 Thread majianpeng
>On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 15:04 -0800, Andy Grover wrote: >> On 01/29/2013 11:03 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: >> >> > So enabling emulate_write_cache=1 in the case when the underlying device >> > has not enabled it is incorrect. >> > >> > I'd like to enable this bit when we know the underlying d

RE: RE: [PATCH] ahci: add a boot option to enable promise ahci

2012-09-24 Thread Tony Hung - PTT 洪瑞嶸
On 2012/9/25 11:05 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > On 09/23/2012 10:34 PM, Tony Hung - PTT 洪瑞嶸 wrote: > > > linux-3.2.0/drivers/ata/ahci.c: In function 'ahci_init_one': > > > > > > Use promise_enable to disable AHCI control PCI RAID. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Hung > > > --- > > > > > > diff

RE: RE: [PATCH] ahci: add a boot option to enable promise ahci

2012-09-24 Thread Tony Hung - PTT 洪瑞嶸
On 2012/9/25 11:05 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > On 09/23/2012 10:34 PM, Tony Hung - PTT 洪瑞嶸 wrote: > > > linux-3.2.0/drivers/ata/ahci.c: In function 'hptiop_host_request_callback': > > > > > > Use min_t(size_t, ...) to fix. Correct this, linux-3.2.0/drivers/ata/ahci.c: In function 'ahci_init_one':

Re: RE: [PATCH] scsi/mvsas: Fix oops when ata command timeout.

2012-08-01 Thread majianpeng
On 2012-08-01 19:21 Xiangliang Yu Wrote: >Hi, Jianpeng > >I think MVSAS shouldn't care the completion sign here, just modify task state >is ok. > > > [snip] >> >> Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma >> --- >> drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c |5 - >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>

RE: Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox} init fix for kdump

2007-01-31 Thread Patro, Sumant
The patch is specific to kdump scenario. What I see in the log is cmd timeout(s) and is not related to the patch. --Sumant -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Urlichs Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 9:50 AM To: linux-scsi@vger.ke

Re: Re: Need assistance

2005-01-20 Thread Jennifer
Order Number: 940029 Order Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:10:02 +0600 We appreciate your patience in the processing of your m o rrtgage request. We have prepared 3.4% deal for you at this time. Verify your information so we can proceed as planned. http://www.xpojga.com/ Thank you. Sincerely, Je

Re: [Re: SCSI bootup problem]

2001-06-11 Thread Kenneth Crudup
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Hactar wrote: > I know somebody who had an all-SCSI Linux system ... ya mean there's systems that *ain't*?! -Kenny -- Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Washington, D.C. Home1: PO Box 914 Silver Spring, MD 20910-0914 [EMA

Re: [Re: SCSI bootup problem]

2001-06-11 Thread Hactar
Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > The kernel has to be on a non-SCSI device (for now). > > > > True. The root fs has to be on a non-SCSI device, yes? > > False. You can have everything on scsi I mean for now, until the problem gets fixed. I know somebody who had an all-SCSI Linux system, so I know it

Re: [Re: SCSI bootup problem]

2001-06-11 Thread Alan Cox
> > > The kernel has to be on a non-SCSI device (for now). > > True. The root fs has to be on a non-SCSI device, yes? False. You can have everything on scsi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Re: SCSI bootup problem]

2001-06-11 Thread Hactar
Alan Cox wrote: > > > "Mark A.Tagliaferro" wrote: > > > If I install LILO to floppy disk instead of Master Boot Sector will the > > > standard kernel be able to boot? > > > > The kernel has to be on a non-SCSI device (for now). True. The root fs has to be on a non-SCSI device, yes? - To unsubsc

Re: [Re: SCSI bootup problem]

2001-06-11 Thread Alan Cox
> "Mark A.Tagliaferro" wrote: > > If I install LILO to floppy disk instead of Master Boot Sector will the > > standard kernel be able to boot? > > The kernel has to be on a non-SCSI device (for now). Thats not true. The kernel needs to be on whatever the BIOS decides to boot Alan - To unsubscr

Re: [Re: SCSI bootup problem]

2001-06-11 Thread Hactar
"Mark A.Tagliaferro" wrote: > If I install LILO to floppy disk instead of Master Boot Sector will the > standard kernel be able to boot? The kernel has to be on a non-SCSI device (for now). > Could I add an IDE device to the system, boot the standard kernel from there, > build a new kernel that

Re: [Re: SCSI bootup problem]

2001-06-11 Thread Rogier Wolff
Mark A . Tagliaferro wrote: > >Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> request_module[block-major-8]: Root fs not mounted > >> VFS: Cannot open root device "803" or 08:03 > >> Please append a correct "root=" boot option > >> Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:03 > >> > >> ...could

Re: [Re: SCSI bootup problem]

2001-06-11 Thread Mark A . Tagliaferro
>Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> request_module[block-major-8]: Root fs not mounted >> VFS: Cannot open root device "803" or 08:03 >> Please append a correct "root=" boot option >> Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:03 >> >> ...could this be because the kernel has to be told