On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 13:56 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:45:53 -0500
> James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 23:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:37:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:50:20AM +0200, Stefan Boresch wrote:
> Just curious: Is the patch for scsi_transport_spi.c you sent me for my
> hardware problem going to make it into an official kernel?
That patch has been requested to go into 2.6.23, so isn't in this list.
--
Intel are signing my pa
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:00:02PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Andrew asked that I provide a status report of pending updates. The
> list is attached below. It's pretty much driver updates and minor bug
> fixes. The main functionality changes are Kay's sysfs updates and the
> shift of the UL
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:45:53 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 23:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:37:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >> Are there any const-ness worries for scsi_host_template, or plan
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:01:53 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 12:55 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:45:53 -0500
> > James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 23:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > > M
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 12:55 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:45:53 -0500
> James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 23:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:37:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:45:53 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 23:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:37:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >> Are there any const-ness worries for scsi_host_template, or plan
James Bottomley wrote:
This whole mess is generated basically because the zero default of the
template should be treated as initiator. How about this, which makes
that manifest?
James
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
index adc9559..7e26440 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/host
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 23:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:37:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> Are there any const-ness worries for scsi_host_template, or plans for
> >> the future? I do not see any other examples of the host template
> >> mem
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:37:33 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > index adc9559..694015d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > @@ -342,6 +342,10 @@ struct Scsi_Host
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:34:00PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Well, sure, the driver is the owner of that memory.
>
> We're talking about common code.
>
> If everybody agrees SHT is R/W in the core, Fujita-san's patch is fine.
Oh ... harder to find, but scsi_module.c does that, as does
scsi_reg
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:37:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Are there any const-ness worries for scsi_host_template, or plans for
the future? I do not see any other examples of the host template
members getting modified.
Goodness, Jeff, you haven't looked too hard. Th
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:37:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Are there any const-ness worries for scsi_host_template, or plans for
> the future? I do not see any other examples of the host template
> members getting modified.
Goodness, Jeff, you haven't looked too hard. There's dozens of exa
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
index adc9559..694015d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
@@ -342,6 +342,10 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_alloc(struct
scsi_host_template *sht, int privsize)
shost->unchecked_isa_dm
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:42:35 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:28 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:00:02 -0500
> > James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew asked that I provide a status report of pending updates.
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:28 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:00:02 -0500
> James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andrew asked that I provide a status report of pending updates. The
> > list is attached below. It's pretty much driver updates and minor bug
> > fixe
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:00:02 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew asked that I provide a status report of pending updates. The
> list is attached below. It's pretty much driver updates and minor bug
> fixes. The main functionality changes are Kay's sysfs updates and the
> s
On Wed, Sep 26 2007 at 3:00 +0200, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew asked that I provide a status report of pending updates. The
> list is attached below. It's pretty much driver updates and minor bug
> fixes. The main functionality changes are Kay's sysfs updates and the
> sh
From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:00:02 -0500
> David Miller (1):
> esp: fix instance numbering.
I'd like to request that this one goes into 2.6.23 as
it is a bug fix and the bug confuses users.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
Andrew asked that I provide a status report of pending updates. The
list is attached below. It's pretty much driver updates and minor bug
fixes. The main functionality changes are Kay's sysfs updates and the
shift of the ULD attachement towards the block prep function.
James
---
Adrian Bunk
20 matches
Mail list logo
