Re: [TOMOYO 15/15] LSM expansion for TOMOYO Linux.

2007-09-06 Thread Paul Moore
On Thursday, September 6 2007 9:04:01 am Tetsuo Handa wrote: > (1) It uses userspace intervention to allow/reject > connections and/or packets based on the application's domain. > Since existent hooks can't be used for this purpose, > I inserted a new hook post_recv_datagram() at skb_re

Re: [RFC]selinux: Improving SELinux read/write performance

2007-09-06 Thread Stephen Smalley
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 16:27 +0900, Yuichi Nakamura wrote: > Hello. > > As I posted before in selinux list, > I found big overhead of SELinux in read/write on some CPUs, > and trying tuning. > There were discussion in previous threads. > Part 1: > http://marc.info/?t=11884534341&r=1&w=2 > Part

Re: [TOMOYO 15/15] LSM expansion for TOMOYO Linux.

2007-09-06 Thread Tetsuo Handa
Hello. Thank you very much for your time, Paul. Yes, you understood what I wanted to do. TOMOYO Linux's approach: (1) It uses userspace intervention to allow/reject connections and/or packets based on the application's domain. Since existent hooks can't be used for this purpose, I in

[RFC]selinux: Improving SELinux read/write performance

2007-09-06 Thread Yuichi Nakamura
Hello. As I posted before in selinux list, I found big overhead of SELinux in read/write on some CPUs, and trying tuning. There were discussion in previous threads. Part 1: http://marc.info/?t=11884534341&r=1&w=2 Part 2: http://marc.info/?t=11888074984&r=1&w=2 I would like to RFC again ab